Talk:Bradenton Marauders

	Chicago portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Chicago, which aims to improve all articles or pages related to Chicago or the Chicago metropolitan area.ChicagoWikipedia:WikiProject ChicagoTemplate:WikiProject ChicagoChicago articles
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.

Baseball: Reds Low‑importance

	Baseball portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Baseball, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of baseball on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.BaseballWikipedia:WikiProject BaseballTemplate:WikiProject BaseballBaseball articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by WikiProject Cincinnati Reds.

Florida

	Florida portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Florida. If you would like to join us, please visit the project page; if you have any questions, please consult the FAQ.FloridaWikipedia:WikiProject FloridaTemplate:WikiProject FloridaFlorida articles
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.

Untitled

I am temporaliy moving this article from Bradenton Pirates to Future Pittsburgh Pirates Class A Bradenton Team. I have found two articles written in the Pittsburgh Tribune Review that state that the new name of this team will not be the Bradenton Pirates, and that a new team nickname will be forthcoming. Therefore we can not call them the Bradenton Pirates.

--Pennsylvania Penguin (talk) 13:44, 30 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Downgrade the amount of Tampa and Sarasota information

The Sarasota White Sox/Red Sox/Reds already have a page for their team, as do the Tampa Tarpons. While the Marauders can trace their roots back to 1957, the modern incarnation of the team was established in 2010. As with all other Florida State League teams in this scenerio, the titles from the Tampa Tarpons and the Sarasota teams should only be noted for those teams. Therefore the Marauders information should be prevalent, however a previous franchise history that traces the teams roots back to 1957 can be noted, but they are technically not the same team.--Pennsylvania Penguin (talk) 20:02, 11 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

To the contrary, they technically ARE the same team, or more precisely the same franchise (just as the Nationals are the Expos franchise and the Twins are the 1901 Senators franchise and the Rangers are the 1961 Senators franchise, etc). An incarnation of a franchise either "is" or "is not" traced to another incarnation in its history. Indeed, the Marauders are directly traced to the Tarpons. As such, it is not historically accurate to not include the previous championships (and any other warranted similar information) within the info box. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 98.64.122.52 (talk) 01:02, 13 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Bradenton Marauders. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20100518084308/http://www.bradenton.com/2010/05/18/2292546/morris-promoted-to-double-a.html to http://www.bradenton.com/2010/05/18/2292546/morris-promoted-to-double-a.html

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 03:45, 7 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]