Talk:Brachydectes
Appearance
This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Brachydectes article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. |
Article policies
|
Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL |
This article is rated Stub-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||
|
Merge discussion
[edit]- The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section. A summary of the conclusions reached follows.
- Nobody replied, so I decided to merge Cocytinus, Molgophis and Pleuroptyx. But Lysorophus is way more notable, so maybe we shouldn't merge it until it's fully confirmed as a synonym. —Trilletrollet [ Talk | Contribs ] 16:14, 4 June 2024 (UTC)
Pardo & Anderson (2016) tentatively synonymised Cocytinus, Lysorophus, Molgophis and Pleuroptyx with Brachydectes, and this apparently hasn't been disputed since then. But I didn't want to just unilaterally merge them in case anybody disagrees. Pinging @NGPezz: who knows a lot about this topic. —Trilletrollet [ Talk | Contribs ] 20:20, 7 April 2024 (UTC)
The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.
Categories:
- Stub-Class amphibian and reptile articles
- Low-importance amphibian and reptile articles
- Stub-Class amphibian and reptile articles of Low-importance
- WikiProject Amphibians and Reptiles articles
- Stub-Class Palaeontology articles
- Low-importance Palaeontology articles
- Stub-Class Palaeontology articles of Low-importance
- WikiProject Palaeontology articles