Talk:Brachialis muscle

Anatomy: Gross Mid‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Anatomy, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Anatomy on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.AnatomyWikipedia:WikiProject AnatomyTemplate:WikiProject AnatomyAnatomy articles
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article has been classified as relating to gross anatomy.

The force production of Brachialis relative to Biceps Brachii

The article claims that Brachialis produces 50% more force than Biceps Brachii. A secondary citation is provided to Saladin Anatomy & Physiology. However, the Saladan A&P textbook gives no source for this claim. I have attempted to search Google Scholar to find verification for this claim and have been unsuccessful which leads me to suspect that the claim may be untrue or unverified. Android9097 (talk) 23:37, 3 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

excuse me, the "teichmann muscle?"

"the teichmann muscle" is not a notable name for the brachialis muscle for it to be in the actual opening text of this articles. ive literally never heard of this name before today, and it is most assuredly not notable, or a hoax. if it's not a hoax, and has some notability to it, it should be moved to an "alternate names" section with information about why that name is there.

also, just a side note, i think it's really weird, absurd even, that we name anatomical body parts *after people*. i don't particularly care to honor some dude who first cut up cadavers and identified each little miniscule part in my body by literally naming body parts after them. it's just... creepy to me. we've had these parts for hundreds of thousands, millions of years, and it just seems like a ridiculous farce to give some special credit to a person just cuz they were the first person

i would create an account and try to make changes myself, but the last several times i tried that, a bot immediately reversed my changes. im tired of being bullied by computers - people were bad enough. anyway, one day i might actually make an account and do editing work here i have time I'm bored idk I'll shut up now -jadephoenix 2600:6C47:A03F:C443:59C6:8A8C:65AE:996C (talk) 02:58, 15 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

im adding an extra bit of info...

i havent found *any* sources so far that give credit to it actually being *called* the teichmann muscle, all the references i find that mention it have a simple "also called the teichmann muscle" regurgitation at the beginning and just move on.

why is this part of the muscles name? why is this an alternative name?

does anyone, anybody, any doctor, and patient, any physical therapist, anatomist, or other care worker call this thing the flippin "Teichmann Muscle"?

anatomy is a special interest of mine, and this one is new 2600:6C47:A03F:C443:59C6:8A8C:65AE:996C (talk) 03:03, 15 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

i do not have an account either b/c i dont really care to. however your arguments were so silly i needed to point out your idiocy! just because you dont like someone else getting credit does not mean it is undeserved

as a matter of fact. Teichman was the doctor in Czechia who experimented extensively with the aforementioned muscle generating almost superior strength by stimulating the muscle with external and chemical stimuli. the Muscle was renamed after him when his results were recognized by the european mendical community. 2A01:6500:A041:536:A2FF:CA65:3500:C25C (talk) 19:32, 17 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]