Talk:Brügger & Thomet APC/Archives/2021/April

Copied

This articles looks like it was pasted from another source: http://www.sadefensejournal.com/wp/?p=1265 I've put a template on it to alert the editors in charge. The article was created with the copied material, so there's no 'good' text to go back to. Rezin (talk) 22:40, 14 October 2014 (UTC)

Tac Reloads

In the design section it states that the APC's bolt lock-back mechanism helps with tactical reload speed. How? In a tactical reload the bolt won't lock back, since a round is in the chamber. I am going to remove the statement, since it is counter-intuitive. Please try to discuss it openly before re-adding it.Grizzly chipmunk (talk) 13:33, 14 March 2015 (UTC)

This is not fair use

¡¿why did you copied and pasted information from this link?!:http://www.sadefensejournal.com/wp/?p=1265 — Preceding unsigned comment added by Kalininos (talk • contribs) 15:08, 29 September 2018 (UTC)

Brügger & Thomet → B&T

Is there any reason to call it “Brügger & Thomet APC9”, considering that the company itself is known as just “B&T” for the last 8 years? And it is called “B&T APCsomething” on the official site everywhere. Consider renaming the article to “B&T APC9”, or even better to “B&T APC” (as it is available in .45 ACP as well). Honeyman (talk) 23:51, 14 May 2019 (UTC)

Source for the delayed blowback action?

I can't seem to find any evidence that the APC9 uses a delayed blowback action.Oktayey (talk) 02:31, 27 April 2020 (UTC)