Talk:Bréguet 270
Appearance
This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Bréguet 270 article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. |
Article policies
|
Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL |
This article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
This article is written in British English, which has its own spelling conventions (colour, travelled, centre, defence, artefact, analyse) and some terms that are used in it may be different or absent from other varieties of English. According to the relevant style guide, this should not be changed without broad consensus. |
Merger
[edit]Yes, but what to call the article, as French manufacturers used confusing designation systems, incorporating sub-type numbers into the main designation, taking the type number out of a natural sequence. I suggest 'Breguet 270 series', as Breguet 270 was the actual designation of the prototype/s.Petebutt (talk) 03:14, 10 April 2010 (UTC)
The other article is far better and more comprehensive so a straight cut and Paste and re-direct are possible here.Petebutt (talk) 06:32, 27 September 2011 (UTC)
Categories:
- Start-Class articles with conflicting quality ratings
- Start-Class France articles
- Low-importance France articles
- All WikiProject France pages
- C-Class aviation articles
- C-Class aircraft articles
- WikiProject Aircraft articles
- Aviation articles needing attention
- WikiProject Aviation articles
- C-Class military history articles
- C-Class military aviation articles
- Military aviation task force articles
- C-Class French military history articles
- French military history task force articles
- C-Class World War II articles
- World War II task force articles
- Wikipedia articles that use British English