Talk:Boys' Ranch/GA2

GA Review

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch

Reviewer: –– Jezhotwells (talk) 22:09, 5 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

I shall be reviewing this article against the Good Article criteria, following its nomination for Good Article status.

GA review (see here for criteria)

It is reasonably well written.
a (prose): b (MoS):
Well written, I made one minor copy-edit, follows the MoS adequately
It is factually accurate and verifiable.
a (references): b (citations to reliable sources): c (OR):
All online references check out. I asume good faith for off line sourcing. Sources appear to be reliable.
It is broad in its coverage.
a (major aspects): b (focused):
The article is broad enough and focussed. I can't think of much more that could be said.
It follows the neutral point of view policy.
Fair representation without bias:
It is stable.
No edit wars, etc.:
It is illustrated by images, where possible and appropriate.
a (images are tagged and non-free images have fair use rationales): b (appropriate use with suitable captions):
the licensing tag on File:Simonkirbyphoto.jpg is incorrect. It is not a "non-free comic" it is a photo of the authors, although it appeared in a comic book reprint. I have changed it to {{Non-free historic image}}, which I think is more accurate and hopefully correct
Overall:
Pass/Fail:

OK, good to go. I am happy to awrad this article GA status. –– Jezhotwells (talk) 23:07, 5 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Thanky kindly fer some mighty fine evaluatin' pawd'nuh - me and the the boys' is much oblidged! --Scott Free (talk) 16:33, 6 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for doing the assessment and well done everyone who worked on the article!! (Emperor (talk) 03:16, 7 April 2010 (UTC))[reply]