Talk:Boxclever
Appearance
This article is rated Stub-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Removed PROD
[edit]I'm disputing the PROD because I was able to find some sources out there that talked about the company to where there is a question of notability here. It's received some newspaper coverage and has been mentioned in two books, both of which are academic texts. I have to say that I'm not entirely convinced that it will ultimately pass notability guidelines per WP:CORP, but there's enough here to where I think that if deletion is to be further pursued, it should be through AfD. Tokyogirl79 (。◕‿◕。) 09:10, 30 March 2013 (UTC)
As it's still trading in 2016, the comment that it went bankrupt needs to be updated, surely? — Preceding unsigned comment added by 88.96.62.17 (talk) 15:37, 24 March 2016 (UTC)
Categories:
- Stub-Class company articles
- Unknown-importance company articles
- Automatically assessed Companies articles
- WikiProject Companies articles
- Stub-Class WikiProject Business articles
- Unknown-importance WikiProject Business articles
- WikiProject Business articles
- Stub-Class Bedfordshire articles
- Mid-importance Bedfordshire articles
- Bedfordshire articles with an incomplete infobox