Talk:Box86

This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Box86 article.
This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic.
New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help.

Article policies

Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL

Software: Computing Low‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Software, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of software on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.SoftwareWikipedia:WikiProject SoftwareTemplate:WikiProject Softwaresoftware articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by WikiProject Computing.

This page describes box86 as being better than QEMU by only emulating the guest program, not a whole guest OS. However QEMU also supports this mode of operation ("user-mode emulation"). How do they compare when both are running in this mode?104.158.234.106 (talk) 08:27, 14 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Ok I tried to clear this up. Jerker123 (talk) 14:04, 8 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

QEMU also supports dynamic binary translation, though I'm not sure if it can intercept and translate calls to dynamically loaded libraries. (Hangover is able to do this though, when used with QEMU to run windows software) More detail on what separates box86 from QEMU would probably be beneficial here.104.158.234.106 (talk) 08:31, 14 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]