Talk:Bowsette/GA2

GA Review

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch

Reviewer: Abryn (talk · contribs) 19:49, 5 May 2019 (UTC)

I mean, I love Bowsette, so how can I not review this? - Bryn (talk) (contributions) 19:49, 5 May 2019 (UTC)

GA review (see here for what the criteria are, and here for what they are not)

1. It is reasonably well written.

   a (prose, spelling, and grammar): b (MoS for lead, layout, word choice, fiction, and lists):

2. It is factually accurate and verifiable.

   a (reference section): b (citations to reliable sources): c (OR): d (copyvio and plagiarism):

   At one point it notes that Luigi and Peach are visibly shocked, but the sources attached don't seem to state as such. Is there a reliable source that can be used to describe the contents of the image?

   Removed 'visibly shocked', should be alright without that bit of text.--Kung Fu Man (talk) 20:56, 5 May 2019 (UTC)

3. It is broad in its coverage.

   a (major aspects): b (focused):

4. It follows the neutral point of view policy.

   Fair representation without bias:

5. It is stable.

   No edit wars, etc.:

6. It is illustrated by images and other media, where possible and appropriate.

   a (images are tagged and non-free content have fair use rationales): b (appropriate use with suitable captions):

7. Overall:

   Pass/Fail:

   Seems pretty rad. Good job with it. - Bryn (talk) (contributions) 20:57, 5 May 2019 (UTC)