Jump to content

Talk:Bowers & Wilkins

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Corporate Advertising Posing as Encyclopedic Entry

[edit]

Why are some "technical corporation" pages allowed and others removed?

B&W is just one of hundreds of loudspeaker manufacturers on the planet.

I'm not sure why ANY coporate entity is allowed to posture on Wiki - except for those rare corporations that any have some true encyclopedic interest, such as IBM. 66.82.9.61 15:01, 1 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Can you explain what you mean exactly with 'encyclopedic interest' and why it should go for a computer company and not for a hifi company? If you look in wikipedia at -for example- game consoles, you will find an enormous amount of product and company entries. Robot1981 (talk) 20:43, 11 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I notice that there is no mention of Wilkins??

Wouldn't it be better to restructure this page according to -for example- the KEF page structure and focus on more factual/historical information instead of product specifications? Robot1981 (talk) 20:43, 11 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Please note: Joe Atkins owner of B&W is a Canadian NOT an American —Preceding unsigned comment added by 71.197.223.70 (talk) 01:15, 14 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Product section

[edit]

Added a product section in line with other similar manufacturers, it is thin on the ground but I didn't want it to read like a catalogue. Let me know what you think.RoyalBlueStuey (talk)

Close paraphrasing

[edit]

Much of this article seems to have been closely paraphrased from B&W's website. David1217 What I've done 17:17, 27 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

I've removed/re-written some material which was pretty much verbatim from http://www.bowersandwilkins.co.uk/our%20history.html. In my view the remaining material in some parts of the Technology, research & development section does show some close paraphrasing from http://www.bowers-wilkins.com/Discover/Discover/Technologies/Overview.html and and its sub-pages, but not enough to constitute a copyright violation. However, editors here should work on improving and re-writing it. The material also needs to be properly sourced with inline citations. Voceditenore (talk) 10:43, 5 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Thanks! David1217 What I've done 22:01, 14 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Rotel

[edit]

The introductory text claims ″Currently, B&W, while still based in Worthing, is part of the B&W Group Ltd., which also includes audio equipment manufacturers Rotel and Classé.″ However Rotel is only in a strategic alliance with B&W and is not owned/ran by the B&W Group. It still operates as an independent family business.

I think B&W has been sold to some Silicon Valley start up computer company!

[edit]

I'm not sure how true this is but I think B&W has been sold to some newly computer tech company from Silicon Valley [1], can someone with concise information confirm this so that we can add it to the page?Bobbyshabangu talk 20:00, 3 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

References

[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Bowers & Wilkins. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 18:46, 6 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on Bowers & Wilkins. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 04:02, 24 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Bowers & Wilkins. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 04:39, 7 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Article Overhaul

[edit]

This article is now out of date and needs updating. Please make edits as you see fit. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Brontorex01 (talkcontribs) 15:53, 6 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]