Talk:Bowerbirds (band)
Appearance
This article must adhere to the biographies of living persons (BLP) policy, even if it is not a biography, because it contains material about living persons. Contentious material about living persons that is unsourced or poorly sourced must be removed immediately from the article and its talk page, especially if potentially libellous. If such material is repeatedly inserted, or if you have other concerns, please report the issue to this noticeboard.If you are a subject of this article, or acting on behalf of one, and you need help, please see this help page. |
This article is rated Stub-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||
|
Notability
[edit]So, there was a previous deleted article, which I admit I was unaware of when creating the current article. However, since that article was deleted, the band have embarked on a US tour supporting The Rosebuds[1] and had their album given a recommended review by Pitchfork, as stated in the article. I believe these point towards notability, along with the 34,600 Google hits that a search for bowerbirds "hymns for a dark horse" produces. Thanks --sparkl!sm talk 19:47, 3 July 2007 (UTC)
- Aye. Agreed. − Twas Now ( talk • contribs • e-mail ) 04:46, 19 July 2007 (UTC)
References
Should a disambiguation page be added? Because bowerbirds currently redirects to the bird.
- This is resolved now, I think. --sparkl!sm talk 19:28, 28 July 2007 (UTC)