Talk:Bowburn

UK geography Low‑importance

	United Kingdom portal This article falls within the scope of WikiProject UK geography, a user-group dedicated to building a comprehensive and quality guide to places in the United Kingdom on Wikipedia. If you wish to participate, share ideas or merely get tips you can join us at the project page where there are resources, to do lists and guidelines on how to write about settlements.UK geographyWikipedia:WikiProject UK geographyTemplate:WikiProject UK geographyUK geography articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

North East England Low‑importance

	North East England portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject North East England, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of North East England on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.North East EnglandWikipedia:WikiProject North East EnglandTemplate:WikiProject North East EnglandNorth East England articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Bowburn in the City of Durham?

The article referred to Bowburn being in the city of Durham. However, whilst it is within the boundary of city authorities, this does not mean it is part of the city. Other than this, a very good article. Logica 00:04, 31 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]

For reference, the City of Durham was issued new letters patent in 1974 applying to the entire local government district. Morwen - Talk 09:27, 8 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Yes, but this still doesn't mean that Bowburn is in the City of Durham. Unlike other local authority areas (namely Sunderland), Durham City Council have refrained from signposting all the district council area as "City of Durham". Logica 23:07, 3 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

"City of Durham" = district council. city of Durham = Durham City itself. Logoistic 03:26, 27 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 3 external links on Bowburn. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 03:43, 24 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]