Talk:Boveri–Sutton chromosome theory
A fact from Boveri–Sutton chromosome theory appeared on Wikipedia's Main Page in the Did you know column on 21 November 2009 (check views). The text of the entry was as follows:
|
This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||
|
A rewrite to improve style.
[edit]It's a good article, but on reading it I felt that the text would be improved by some restructuring and tightening, so I've given it a rewrite, I hope without having done any violence to the meaning. --Kay Dekker (talk) 02:21, 21 November 2009 (UTC)
- Good rewrite. Thanks Earthdirt (talk) 16:27, 23 November 2009 (UTC)
- Nice pix - thanks! --Kay Dekker (talk) 20:58, 25 November 2009 (UTC)
I don't understand this at all can some one wright it so a seventh grader can understand!!! from lily Sat. Dec.5
External links modified
[edit]Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified one external link on Boveri–Sutton chromosome theory. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20160314091118/http://esp.org/foundations/genetics/classical/holdings/s/wss-03.pdf to http://www.esp.org/foundations/genetics/classical/holdings/s/wss-03.pdf/
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}}
(last update: 5 June 2024).
- If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
- If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 03:21, 24 July 2017 (UTC)