Jump to content

Talk:Bound (Star Trek: Enterprise)/GA1

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

GA Review

[edit]
GA toolbox
Reviewing

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch

Reviewer: Taylor Trescott (talk · contribs) 10:56, 25 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Going to review this in the next few days. Taylor Trescott - my talk + my edits 10:56, 25 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Alright, here are my concerns.

  1. Lead: Shouldn't showrunner be one word? Show runner redirects to showrunner.
  2. Production: "she wasn't pleased" "wasn't" -> "was not" per MOS:N'T
  3. Production: "Allan Kroeker was the director of "Bound", he had previously directed two episodes earlier in the season, both "Storm Front" and "Home"." This is a little clunky in its current state. How about "Allen Kroeker, who was the director of "Bound" had previously directed two episodes earlier in the season, both "Storm Front" and "Home"." Also, how come is there a "both" before Storm Front?
  4. Production: "Fortunato said that she the three actresses playing" I think that there is a word missing here.
  5. Production: "While the actresses playing the Orion women were required on all days, Lucking filmed all his scenes on the final day of shooting. The main cabin of the Orion ship was constructed in full specifically for this episode while the bridge was only a single wall as it was only seen on screen as a view-screen background." There is no citation for these sentences at the end. Could you please add one?
  6. Reception: "James Hunt at the website Den of Geek listed" I think these "at the"'s should be replaced with "of the". This isn't required, but it's just how I write it in my episode articles and I've seen it used in FAs (The Joy of Sect, Road to the Multiverse, etc.)
  7. Reception: "gave the "Bound"" The "the" can be dropped.

That's it. Now on hold. Taylor Trescott - my talk + my edits 19:39, 27 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

  • Thanks for reviewing. I think I've addressed all of those points. Pretty much all as described, with the only one where my edits went further was for the fourth point as I did some sentence reconstruction. Miyagawa (talk) 20:52, 27 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]