Talk:Bottom-up approach of the Holocaust

This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Bottom-up approach of the Holocaust article.
This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic.
New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help.

Article policies

Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL

History Low‑importance

	History portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject History, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of the subject of History on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.HistoryWikipedia:WikiProject HistoryTemplate:WikiProject Historyhistory articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Germany Low‑importance

	Germany portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Germany, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Germany on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.GermanyWikipedia:WikiProject GermanyTemplate:WikiProject GermanyGermany articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Could have issued an order

What are these vague statements about "could have issued an order"? There were thousands of orders to kills Jews, indeed, there was an effective national policy in this direction. This phraseology has the air of dataless philosophizing, when it should be a report on the competing views of historians. 84.226.164.2 (talk) 09:55, 27 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

"Adolf Eichmann, who was considered one of the top leaders closest to Adolf Hitler"

Given that Eichmann never even met Hitler in person, it is a tad hard to believe that this is really what Aly wrote about him. This whole article feels like someone's personal interpretation of the book. Zero^talk 14:10, 20 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This article

This article reads like a poor student assignment. The topic is notable (once the title is made grammatical) but hardly anything here is of value. Amongst other things, two of the three citations to Stone don't seem to have what it is cited for. I think that AfD is appropriate if something isn't done soon. Zero^talk 08:47, 30 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]