Talk:Bottleneck (engineering)

Untitled

The following discussion is an archived discussion of the proposal. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the proposal was no consensus for move--Fuhghettaboutit (talk) 18:25, 29 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Requested move

Bottleneck (engineering) to Bottleneck

vapmachado ^talk.cw 01:19, 26 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Bottleneck (engineering) and Bottleneck (logistics) and Bottleneck (traffic) are all dominant meanings. Anthony Appleyard (talk) 04:34, 26 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose dab should be at the base name. 70.51.8.231 (talk) 04:58, 26 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose per Anthony. older ≠ wiser 00:47, 27 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]
The traffic meaning is what comes to my mind first, although the engineering definition is a more general abstraction. Keeping as disambiguation will prevent ambiguity (no surprise there!) Knepflerle (talk) 18:10, 29 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the proposal. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on this talk page. No further edits should be made to this section.

Remove bottlenecks software section to new article - 'bottlenecks (computing)' with alternate redirect name 'Hot spots'

self explanatoryken (talk) 05:05, 11 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Merger proposal

Someone has suggested merging Bottleneck (traffic) and Bottleneck (logistics) into this article. In my view, this is a sensible proposal that will improve Wikipedia. Both those articles are short and express the same concept. What do others think? Sidefall (talk) 09:36, 9 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]