Talk:Boston and Albany Railroad

Trains Mid‑importance

Trains Portal

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Trains, an attempt to build a comprehensive and detailed guide to rail transport on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, you can visit the project page, where you can join the project and/or contribute to the discussion. See also: WikiProject Trains to do list and the Trains Portal.TrainsWikipedia:WikiProject TrainsTemplate:WikiProject Trainsrail transport articles

Mid

This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

This article lacks sufficient references and/or adequate inline citations.

United States: Massachusetts / Boston Low‑importance

	United States portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject United States, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of topics relating to the United States of America on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the ongoing discussions. Template Usage Articles Requested! Become a Member Project Talk Alerts United StatesWikipedia:WikiProject United StatesTemplate:WikiProject United StatesUnited States articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	Massachusetts portal This article is supported by WikiProject Massachusetts.
	Massachusetts portal This article is supported by WikiProject Massachusetts - Boston (assessed as Low-importance).

New York (state) Low‑importance

	New York (state) portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject New York (state), a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of the U.S. state of New York on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.New York (state)Wikipedia:WikiProject New York (state)Template:WikiProject New York (state)New York (state) articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Type of service

Did the B&A provide both passenger and freight service throughout its history, or just one or the other at certain times? -- Beland 20:36, 26 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Early railroads almost always provided both; I don't think the B&A was an exception. Penn Central operated passenger service over the entire B&A main line until Amtrak's startup in 1971, and commuter rail until whenever the MBTA started operating it. --NE2 21:30, 26 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Splitting the article

I would strongly support splitting the article. While it is true that the MBCR operates service for the MBTA over a portion of the line, the B&A is a defunct company with many different branches that are now owned by various companies while the Framingham/Worcester Line is a single commuter line and I therefore believe it should match the standard for other MBTA commuter lines. Darksun23c 19:42, 19 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I STRONGLY suggest splitting the article. Very difficult to read article and quite confusing at times. It should only discuss the CURRENT railroad! Alamar2001 05:47, 22 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I concur, the Boston and Albany Railroad and the MBTA Line are two separate things, for users looking for information on the MBTA service this page is inadequate Enfiladekh1 00:20, 15 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I have split the two articles.Enfiladekh1 01:27, 15 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Fair use rationale for Image:B&aoldlogo.jpg

Image:B&aoldlogo.jpg is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.

Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If there is other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images lacking such an explanation can be deleted one week after being tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.

BetacommandBot (talk) 05:28, 2 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Done Added fair use rationale. Slambo (Speak) 11:58, 2 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Image copyright problem with Image:OP-2668.jpg

The image Image:OP-2668.jpg is used in this article under a claim of fair use, but it does not have an adequate explanation for why it meets the requirements for such images when used here. In particular, for each page the image is used on, it must have an explanation linking to that page which explains why it needs to be used on that page. Please check

That there is a non-free use rationale on the image's description page for the use in this article.
That this article is linked to from the image description page.

This is an automated notice by FairuseBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. --08:31, 23 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Chatham B&A station; Same as the NYC station?

Was the Chatham, New York Boston & Albany station the same one as the Chatham (NYCRR station)? If so perhaps this calls for a redirect. ----DanTD (talk) 05:47, 28 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Yes, and the Rutland served it too. --NE2 06:02, 28 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Article fails to name the year the B&W became the B&A

Excellent, excellent article.

But I came here for one fact, and, typical of my luck, it is the very one missing. Yet it is pivotal: We aren't told in what year the RR's name changed from B&W to B&A. All we get is this ellipsis:

"Two mergers, on September 4, 1867 and December 28, 1870 brought the three companies together, along with the Hudson and Boston Railroad (a branch to Hudson, New York — see below) into one company, known as the Boston and Albany Railroad."

which doesn't do it. In fact, it doesn't even pin down the decade.

Anyone writing a historical article, as I am, now has to go elsewhere to find the data to make the simple statement, "The B&W was renamed the B&A in 18xx."

Please add.

And check for other instances for missing dates.

And add a comma after '1870'.--Jim Luedke — Preceding unsigned comment added by Jimlue (talk • contribs) 17:38, 30 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for the comments. I agree. The article doesn't lay out the corporate evolution of the various stock entities that developed into the B&A. I am working on a rewrite that addresses this and some other issues raised below. Cheers... Risk Engineer (talk) 12:19, 22 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Separate article for Western railroad

I propose to split Western railroad off into a separate, more detailed article. When the line opened it was the first trunk line built in the US that was meant to be operated with locomotives all the way. B&O and Portage had inclined planes.

Cheers ... Risk Engineer (talk) 13:24, 1 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Hm, that's an interesting idea. On one hand, the Western probably had enough in its four decades of existence to merit a separate article. On the other, from the beginning there was the intention of it joining with the B&W, and there was a great deal of interplay between the two railroads that might be easier to account for in one article. Perhaps just expand the B&W and Western history in this article for now, and split one or both off later if the sections get long enough? Pi.1415926535 (talk) 20:08, 1 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for the feedback. I will rework the material into the current article and see what everyone thinks... Cheers... Risk Engineer (talk) 01:16, 19 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Boston and Albany Railroad. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20151104155926/http://www.earlpleasants.com/search_1.asp to http://www.earlpleasants.com/search_1.asp

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 12:04, 6 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]