Talk:Boston Cannons

Comment

Fixes to Current Roster:

Untitled

Boston Cannon's roster is outdated. I am changing it to the current roster (2009). —Preceding unsigned comment added by 128.2.188.211 (talk) 23:27, 1 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Logo for Boston Cannons

The logo posted here is incorrect, see the new logo (in use for a few years) here: http://www.bostoncannons.com/ — Preceding unsigned comment added by 153.2.247.32 (talk) 14:19, 10 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 3 external links on Boston Cannons. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 21:24, 23 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Split page into Boston Cannons (MLL) and Boston Cannons (PLL)?

Functionally these are different teams, they were in different leagues, when they joined the PLL they received a new roster, and while it can absolutely be argued that they're the same organization since they kept the history, I'm unsure if that really matters so much when they switched leagues and didn't even keep the same roster. Jsfxmn (talk) 01:25, 15 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

As someone who covers the league professionally, I would recommend these pages remain together. While a new roster was allocated, these franchises are functionally the same thanks to the PLL and MLL's merger. The PLL specifically used the language of absorbing the Cannons franchise into the PLL when that merger was completed. The PLL retains the MLL's history, and the Cannons retain their previous history. As noted on their socials and website, the Cannons franchise boasts the MLL team's championships, and the establish date of 2001 is in their branding. Like the Denver Outlaws, I consider it like the Cleveland Browns returning to the NFL with its history intact. 134.48.109.82 (talk) 14:49, 16 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

KEEP This is always a sticky issue. Are they the same corporation- no. But is the Cleveland Browns and Charlotte Hornets can both take the history of their teams (especially Charlotte), then these two should be in the same article. I think it just needs to be made VERY CLEAR the difference between the MLL years and PLL years. (Bes2224 (talk) 00:23, 23 November 2023 (UTC))[reply]