Talk:Bostan v. Bush

Law Low‑importance

	Law portal This redirect is within the scope of WikiProject Law, an attempt at providing a comprehensive, standardised, pan-jurisdictional and up-to-date resource for the legal field and the subjects encompassed by it.LawWikipedia:WikiProject LawTemplate:WikiProject Lawlaw articles
Low	This redirect has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

United States

This redirect is within the scope of WikiProject United States, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of topics relating to the United States of America on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the ongoing discussions.

United StatesWikipedia:WikiProject United StatesTemplate:WikiProject United StatesUnited States articles

Correction and Detention Facilities (defunct)

This redirect is within the scope of WikiProject Correction and Detention Facilities, a project which is currently considered to be defunct.Correction and Detention FacilitiesWikipedia:WikiProject Correction and Detention FacilitiesTemplate:WikiProject Correction and Detention FacilitiesCorrection and Detention Facilities articles

Human rights Low‑importance

	This redirect is within the scope of WikiProject Human rights, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Human rights on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Human rightsWikipedia:WikiProject Human rightsTemplate:WikiProject Human rightsHuman rights articles
Low	This redirect has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

hangon

Someone placed a {{db}} on this article, claiming the topic isn't notable.

I dispute this. I am concerned this drive-by tagging may be an instance of WP:IDONTLIKEIT.

The habeas petitions are recently of great notability following the SCOTUS ruling in Boumediene v. Bush. Further Bostan Karim is someone we know had an appeal filed under the Detainee Treatment Act -- which I think is notable. Geo Swan (talk) 00:15, 19 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

The first paragraph of the article could do a MUCH better job of establishing the notability if this article is indeed notable. We don't publish every habeas case filed here. Wikipedia isn't a law library, is it?Plhofmei (talk) 16:01, 19 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]