Talk:Bosellia mimetica
Appearance
This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||
|
A fact from Bosellia mimetica appeared on Wikipedia's Main Page in the Did you know column on 24 February 2024 (check views). The text of the entry was as follows:
|
Did you know nomination
[edit]- The following is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was: promoted by Rjjiii talk 03:56, 16 February 2024 (UTC)
( )
- ... that the sea slug Bosellia mimetica benefits from photosynthesis? Source: La limace bénéficie donc en outre des sucres synthétisés grâce à une photosynthèse* qui a lieu dans la paroi de son système digestif.
5x expanded by Cwmhiraeth (talk). Self-nominated at 13:34, 4 February 2024 (UTC). Post-promotion hook changes for this nom will be logged at Template talk:Did you know nominations/Bosellia mimetica; consider watching this nomination, if it is successful, until the hook appears on the Main Page.
- starting review--Kevmin § 19:43, 4 February 2024 (UTC)
- Article expansion is new enough and long enough. The first sentence of the Description is very close to the source article, are you able to rewrite it a bit more to avoid paraphrasing issues?--Kevmin § 21:28, 4 February 2024 (UTC)
- courtesy ping @Cwmhiraeth:--Kevmin § 17:37, 8 February 2024 (UTC)
- @Kevmin: That sentence was there before I started my expansion. I have rephrased it. Cwmhiraeth (talk) 11:04, 9 February 2024 (UTC)
- Article expansion is new enough and long enough. paraphrasing issue has been resolved. Article is cited to neutral sources, and sources are reliable per standards. no issues with DYK rules or wiki rules seen at this point. article looks good to go.--Kevmin § 17:40, 9 February 2024 (UTC)