Talk:Born This Way (song)/GA1
Appearance
GA Review
[edit]GA toolbox |
---|
Reviewing |
Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch
Reviewer: Rp0211 (talk2me) 19:04, 2 July 2011 (UTC)
- OVERALL REVIEW
After reviewing this article thoroughly, I have decided to put this article on hold at this time. There are many grammar and spelling mistakes that are keeping this article from reaching good article status. I believe these mistakes can be fixed within the general seven days allowed, so that is why I put it on hold. - Rp0211 (talk2me) 01:27, 3 July 2011 (UTC)
- Is it reasonably well written?
- Is it factually accurate and verifiable?
- A. References to sources:
- B. Citation of reliable sources where necessary:
- C. No original research:
- A. References to sources:
- Is it broad in its coverage?
- A. Major aspects:
- B. Focused:
- A. Major aspects:
- Is it neutral?
- Fair representation without bias:
- Fair representation without bias:
- Is it stable?
- No edit wars, etc:
- No edit wars, etc:
- Does it contain images to illustrate the topic?
- A. Images are copyright tagged, and non-free images have fair use rationales:
- B. Images are provided where possible and appropriate, with suitable captions:
- A. Images are copyright tagged, and non-free images have fair use rationales:
- Overall:
- Pass or Fail:
- Pass or Fail:
- Lead
- No issues
- Background
- "White Shadow, one of the producers of the track, credited Gaga with coming up the idea..." - Put "with" between "up" and "the"
- " Harkening back to the early '90s, when Madonna..." - Fix spacing at beginning of quote
- "...your birth is infinite. - Add quote at end
- Artwork and release
- No issues
- Composition
- No issues
- Remixes
- "...they designed teh remix." - Fix spelling
- Critical reception
- No issues
- Chart performance
- "...as well as becoming Gaga's third number one singl." - Fix spelling
- "with 4,602 plays after three days of availability, the highest detections total by a debuting song in the chart's history." - Needs reference
- "...which debuted at number nine with 70 million audience." - Fix wording
- Music video
- No issues
- Live performances
- "At the February 19, 2011, date of The Monster Ball Tour..." - Fix wording
- Other performances
- No issues
- Track listing and formats
- No issues
- Credits and personnel
- No issues
- Charts and certifications
- This is not required for GA status, but Template:Singlechart helps organize chart positions better.
- Radio adds and release history
- No issues
- See also
- No issues
- References
- No issues
- Fixed Background section errors and 'teh remix'. WIKIPEDIAN PENGUIN (♫♫) 01:53, 3 July 2011 (UTC)
- Thank you Wikipedia Penguin for fixing the other errors, and thank you Rp for reviewing the article. As for {{singlechart}}, here is my point. {{Singlechart}} is especially useful for articles which are not organized, devoid of sources, have low visibility among the users and prone to carelessness. Not the case with the Lady Gaga articles, where every article is pruned and honed to perfection, including the charts, the body, the references etc. Hence the organization is also done better here, and does not need singlechart template to validate it. Also, it was decided through an extensive (even exhaustive) discussion in my talk page that the template is really not mandatory and is decided by the above scenarios I mentioned. Please check if there are more issues that you can see. — Legolas (talk2me) 05:29, 3 July 2011 (UTC)
- Since all of the issues have been addressed, I feel confident putting this article in good article status. Congratulations and keep up the good work. - Rp0211 (talk2me) 18:28, 3 July 2011 (UTC)
- Thank you Wikipedia Penguin for fixing the other errors, and thank you Rp for reviewing the article. As for {{singlechart}}, here is my point. {{Singlechart}} is especially useful for articles which are not organized, devoid of sources, have low visibility among the users and prone to carelessness. Not the case with the Lady Gaga articles, where every article is pruned and honed to perfection, including the charts, the body, the references etc. Hence the organization is also done better here, and does not need singlechart template to validate it. Also, it was decided through an extensive (even exhaustive) discussion in my talk page that the template is really not mandatory and is decided by the above scenarios I mentioned. Please check if there are more issues that you can see. — Legolas (talk2me) 05:29, 3 July 2011 (UTC)