Talk:Born-Alive Infants Protection Act

This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Born-Alive Infants Protection Act article.
This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic.
New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help.

Article policies

Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL

Law Low‑importance

	Law portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Law, an attempt at providing a comprehensive, standardised, pan-jurisdictional and up-to-date resource for the legal field and the subjects encompassed by it.LawWikipedia:WikiProject LawTemplate:WikiProject Lawlaw articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

United States Low‑importance

	United States portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject United States, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of topics relating to the United States of America on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the ongoing discussions. Template Usage Articles Requested! Become a Member Project Talk Alerts United StatesWikipedia:WikiProject United StatesTemplate:WikiProject United StatesUnited States articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Abortion

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Abortion, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Abortion on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.AbortionWikipedia:WikiProject AbortionTemplate:WikiProject AbortionAbortion articles
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.

Looks like propaganda

How about putting up how every senator voted, and not just Obama and Clinton? As it stands, people use this page for the shock value of "Obama supports killing babies".

Well, Obama was the only opponent. Notice how it passed unanimously after he left? ✏✎✍✌✉✈✇✆✃✄Ⓠ‽ (talk) 21:55, 30 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Uh hello?? Obama joined the US Senate in 2005, way after the bill was passed. Where's your head?? LeoTrottier (talk) 02:45, 9 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

...It went through the Illinois senate first, with the exact same language. That was the bill Obama voted against. He voted with it in the Federal Senate, when he was no longer in liberal Chicago, and where people would actually go "What the F***?"Not even Mr. Lister's Koromon survived intact. 07:29, 5 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

More balanced citations

For a more balanced view of the law, there need to be citations/external links that are not only from a single pro-life organization's website. 212.179.71.70 (talk) 13:27, 18 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Voting Log

It might be helpful to provide a list of which senators voted for and against the Born-Alive Act. For other Wikipedia precedents, see USA Patriot Act, the Bipartisan Campaign Reform Act, and the War Powers Act.M. Frederick (talk) 14:56, 30 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Difference between this and the 2001 version of the bill?

I have been doing some research about the bill, and found a similar version, but much more extensive posed to congress in 2001, what is the difference between the bills? Twhit0812 (talk) 20:28, 29 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Born-Alive Infants Protection Act. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20080918081323/http://www.ilga.gov:80/legislation/BillStatus.asp?DocNum=1082&GAID=3&DocTypeID=SB&LegId=3910&SessionID=3&GA=93 to http://www.ilga.gov/legislation/BillStatus.asp?DocNum=1082&GAID=3&DocTypeID=SB&LegId=3910&SessionID=3&GA=93

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 06:13, 6 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Recent born-alive bills

It seems this page is being used to suggest recent born-alive bills (and Trump's executive order) are strictly redundant virtue signalling. Can someone add an explanation of the differences? (My guess is that the BAIP Act only protects against outright murder, whereas recent bills/EO are requiring giving medical attention to the child.) — Preceding unsigned comment added by 12.190.236.200 (talk) 14:04, 24 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]