Talk:Borman Expressway/GA1

GA Reassessment

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch

Starting GA reassessment as part of the GA Sweeps process. Jezhotwells (talk) 18:12, 23 January 2010 (UTC)

Checking against GA criteria

GA review (see here for criteria)

1. It is reasonably well written.

   a (prose): b (MoS):

   OK

2. It is factually accurate and verifiable.

   a (references): b (citations to reliable sources): c (OR):

   I added a cite for the flooding, as there was flooding in August 20007 as well, and measures are in place to alleviate the flooding this section could be expanded

3. It is broad in its coverage.

   a (major aspects): b (focused):

4. It follows the neutral point of view policy.

   Fair representation without bias:

5. It is stable.

   No edit wars, etc.:

6. It is illustrated by images, where possible and appropriate.

   a (images are tagged and non-free images have fair use rationales): b (appropriate use with suitable captions):

7. Overall:

   Pass/Fail:

   I made some copy-eits and re-arranged the pictures to improve the format. Article keeps GA status. I recommend that a map is added to this article, but it is not a GA requirement. Jezhotwells (talk) 18:42, 23 January 2010 (UTC)