Talk:Borealonectes
Appearance
This article is rated Stub-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||
|
Consider adding a little more context
[edit]The intro is pretty heavy on the latin jargon, even for me. Also no estimated fossil date is given.PB666 yap 02:41, 12 July 2008 (UTC) Also in the text it says "Named in 2008 by Sato and Wu," but the references gives Sate . . .and Wu.
- I can't do much about the taxonomy, as there aren't generally accepted common names for these groups, but I can address the other things. J. Spencer (talk) 02:50, 12 July 2008 (UTC)
Categories:
- Stub-Class amphibian and reptile articles
- Low-importance amphibian and reptile articles
- Stub-Class amphibian and reptile articles of Low-importance
- WikiProject Amphibians and Reptiles articles
- Stub-Class Palaeontology articles
- Low-importance Palaeontology articles
- Stub-Class Palaeontology articles of Low-importance
- WikiProject Palaeontology articles