Talk:Bonshō/GA1
Appearance
GA Review
[edit]GA toolbox |
---|
Reviewing |
Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch
Reviewer: Chiswick Chap (talk · contribs) 14:00, 17 May 2013 (UTC)
Rate | Attribute | Review Comment |
---|---|---|
1. Well-written: | ||
1a. the prose is clear, concise, and understandable to an appropriately broad audience; spelling and grammar are correct. | good | |
1b. it complies with the Manual of Style guidelines for lead sections, layout, words to watch, fiction, and list incorporation. | lead:
| |
2. Verifiable with no original research: | ||
2a. it contains a list of all references (sources of information), presented in accordance with the layout style guideline. | well cited. | |
2b. reliable sources are cited inline. All content that could reasonably be challenged, except for plot summaries and that which summarizes cited content elsewhere in the article, must be cited no later than the end of the paragraph (or line if the content is not in prose). | ok | |
2c. it contains no original research. | ok | |
3. Broad in its coverage: | ||
3a. it addresses the main aspects of the topic. | seems to do so | |
3b. it stays focused on the topic without going into unnecessary detail (see summary style). | no wandering | |
4. Neutral: it represents viewpoints fairly and without editorial bias, giving due weight to each. | correct tone | |
5. Stable: it does not change significantly from day to day because of an ongoing edit war or content dispute. | single editor | |
6. Illustrated, if possible, by media such as images, video, or audio: | ||
6a. media are tagged with their copyright statuses, and valid non-free use rationales are provided for non-free content. | all images licensed on Commons | |
6b. media are relevant to the topic, and have suitable captions. | all images relevant and captioned | |
7. Overall assessment. | Interesting article integrating scholarly detail in an attractive and informative manner. A pleasure to find here at GA. |