Jump to content

Talk:Bonjela

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Speedy delete?

[edit]

This article smells like G11 (advertisement) to me and needs a rewrite to be encyclopedic. However, my CSD template was removed as soon as I put it on the page. Why? Does Bonjela have some sort of cultural significance or something? --Tinctorius 08:24, 4 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Not to the levels of Tylenol or other equally popular brands, but yes, it does. The article is in need of a little rewrite, but the current {{ad}} tag suffices to identify the current problems. In my opinion, it doesn't cut as a clear G11 - you may however want to to try AfD instead. Regards, Phaedriel - 10:20, 4 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

In the UK it's pretty much the standard product, and well-known due to its lovely taste. 135.196.2.145 (talk) 14:35, 12 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Initial sting

[edit]

Would the initial sting produced when using Bonjela be worth noting in the main article? Especially since one of the things you're talking about is pain-relief and it may mislead people. —Preceding unsigned comment added by BlueStream (talk • contribs) 12:56, 5 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Are you sure you're thinking of bonjela and not some other mouth-ulcer medicine? Bonjela is known as being very mild, so that you can even use it in small doses for teething babies- other mouth ulcer things (like Frador) list on the packaging that you'll experience "Transient smarting"(ie:burning agony) but Bonjela doesn't sting at all- the only thing that might hurt is the fact that you have to touch the sore area to apply it?Himynameishelen (talk) 15:05, 30 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]
seems to sting a bit to me. --87.127.117.246 (talk) 22:51, 18 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]
The original bonjela does sting for about a second when you put it on the ulcer, but there is a 'bonjela cool' that I saw in Boots, that is meant to be more soothing and not have the initial sting. Does anyone know anymore about this, or why it does/not sting? Also, a quick search turned this Netdoctor page, which at a glance seems very informative. I don't have the time now to incorporate info from it, so I put it here for others to do, or even me to do it later, if I remember! 86.29.76.37 (talk) 13:27, 8 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Ah, I've only ever used Bonjela cool, so that's probably why I wouldn't know- however to be honest, it doesn't really seem that important a fact- I'd say feel free to put it in if you feel it's relevant though.Himynameishelen (talk) 21:15, 28 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Oh, you mean that unholy agony that lasts for about three seconds? Yeah, might be worth mentioning I think. 93.107.72.121 (talk) 15:01, 1 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Teething

[edit]

Why is teething in the "beyond intended usage" sentence, when the packet in the photo clearly says 'for teething' on it? —Preceding unsigned comment added by 135.196.2.145 (talk) 11:35, 12 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Bonjela. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 20:51, 5 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Bonjela. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 08:40, 23 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Talk:Bonjela&oldid=1200254516"