Talk:Boney Peak

Mountains Low‑importance

	Mountains portal This article is part of WikiProject Mountains, a project to systematically present information on mountains. If you would like to participate, you can choose to edit the article attached to this page (see Contributing FAQ for more information), or visit the project page where you can join the project and/or contribute to the discussion.MountainsWikipedia:WikiProject MountainsTemplate:WikiProject MountainsMountain
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

California: Southern California

	California portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject California, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of the U.S. state of California on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.CaliforniaWikipedia:WikiProject CaliforniaTemplate:WikiProject CaliforniaCalifornia
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by Southern California task force (assessed as Low-importance).

Snowfall

It snowed heavily in the low elevations in Newbury Park in March 1989. It also snowed on the summit of Boney in March 2006.LorenzoB 00:52, 4 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Two Boney Mountains

Okay, I've done a little research and sorted out what happened here. This page was a description of Boney Mountain, a ridge in Point Mugu State Park seen from the 101 freeway. But it was named and linked to as Boney Peak, a nearby peak in the Santa Monica Mountains NRA. Finding it through the link from Santa Monica Mountains, I added the photo and stats for Boney Peak.

I'll rename this article to Boney Mountain, and remove applicable bits to a separate Boney Peak article. --Justin 18:32, 17 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Mystery Mountain

There is a page on Peakbagger.com (see reference in reference section). There is, however, no data at U.S. Board on Geographic Names for Boney Peak in Ventura County. There is data for Boney Mountain but the coordinates do not match. If his seems wrong to you it might be the best to start a new article about Boney Mountain which is currently a redirect. I already moved this article and asked to have it moved back. --DRoll (talk) 01:57, 2 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I found a feature near the coordinates given in the article using this. Zoom in closely, and look a little west. It gives U.S. Geological Survey Geographic Names Information System: Boney Mountain for the point. How's that for a kettle of fish? —EncMstr (talk) 03:29, 2 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I just tried the GNIS link. Interesting way to find out their database server is Oracle. But the mapping URL uses the same database—I thought. The mystery deepens. —EncMstr (talk) 03:30, 2 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Boney Peak, Exchange Peak and Tri-Peaks, all listed at Santa Monica Mountains#Named Peaks and in Peakbagger's database, are local names; they're not recognized by the BGN. Santa Monica Mountains National Recreation Area's website has a local map of Circle X Ranch showing them here. It has elevations and locations, but no coordinates listed.

Boney Peak is the specific rockpile in my picture. It's not Boney Mountain, which is the high point on a another ridge, and deserves separate coverage.

I believe the original author and I confused the two when I first added the photo and infobox, then realized the o.a. had written about Boney Mountain. --Justin (talk) 15:37, 6 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for the PDF. I created an external link for it in the article. --DRoll (talk) 19:40, 6 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Waterfall?

I removed the information about the waterfall because

The was not citation.
The location of the summit is not well defined.

I'll try to resolve this somehow but it might take a while. –droll [chat]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on Boney Peak. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 19:59, 5 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]