Talk:Bone disease
Appearance
This article is rated List-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||
|
Ideal sources for Wikipedia's health content are defined in the guideline Wikipedia:Identifying reliable sources (medicine) and are typically review articles. Here are links to possibly useful sources of information about Bone disease.
|
Requested move 20 June 2021
[edit]- The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review after discussing it on the closer's talk page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.
The result of the move request was: Wrong venue: nothing that can be technically done. Sending to AfD or redirecting to a more appropriate article is a separate editorial decision. No such user (talk) 06:40, 7 July 2021 (UTC)
Bone disease → Category:Bone disorders – This page is merely a list of bone diseases, which I think fits better as a category on its own, possibly as subcategory under Musculoskeletal disorders. Thoughts? 𐩘 Datapass talk ⌇ contribs 13:21, 20 June 2021 (UTC)
- Support agree with the nom. This is just an alphabetical list for which a category is better suited. Bone#Clinical significance and I'm sure many other pages provide relevant links.Tom (LT) (talk) 20:30, 21 June 2021 (UTC)
- Comment I'm not sure this is technically the right venue for this discussion. What's being proposed isn't so much a literal move as a deletion and the creation/population of a new category. Except we already have the category Category:Osteopathies which I take to be more or less synonymous with "bone diseases" (though some diseases listed in this article are instead categorized in the parent cat, Category:Musculoskeletal disorders, or a sibling cat) - so effectively this is just a deletion discussion.
- If this were AfD, I would probably agree with deletion, not because the topic isn't notable, but because the current content has virtually no value (i.e. WP:TNT). Bone § Clinical significance is the sort of content that would be appropriate for an article at this name. Until someone wants to create a more detailed standalone article, I would suggest making bone disease a redirect to that section. Colin M (talk) 16:17, 28 June 2021 (UTC)
The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.