Talk:Bombylius major

This article is rated B-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.
It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:

Insects Low‑importance

	Insects portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Insects, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of insects on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.InsectsWikipedia:WikiProject InsectsTemplate:WikiProject InsectsInsects articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Diptera Low‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Diptera, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of flies on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.DipteraWikipedia:WikiProject DipteraTemplate:WikiProject DipteraDiptera articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the importance scale.
	This article has been automatically rated by a bot or other tool because one or more other projects use this class. Please ensure the assessment is correct before removing the `\|auto=` parameter.

Untitled

I modified some of the header titles in order to be in accordance with the guidelines established for the WikiProject Diptera, and re-arranged the order. I introduced a new image of the fly's mating. I added additional information to the Food Resources and lead section, and introduced an additional source to resolve a flag that had been picked up over a missing citation in the Description section. I also fixed some other minor grammatical errors. AnuBalasubramanian (talk) 04:24, 15 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

I was able to add additional images of B. major to enhance the learning experience of readers. Added on to this, I proofread the entire article and found some duplicated distribution information. Thus, I edited out repeated knowledge and more succinctly summarized it into a heading. Beyond that, your headings were well correlated with your content and the rest of the article was informationally sound. StanTheWu (talk) 20:01, 17 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

I went through the article and made changes to grammatical and spelling errors, as well as slightly outdated or unclear word choices. I also added some citations throughout the article and added further taxonomic information regarding the proboscis. I fixed several sentence fragments in the Food Resources section, as well as added an internal link for holometabolism. Overall, the structure and content of your article was well-written. The number of pictures and videos included in the article is substantial and they serve as useful visual aids. ArndtH (talk) 03:37, 18 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

I spaced out the lead and added a little more information to it, reusing existing citations. Notably, this article is very well illustrated! XuLily (talk) 11:10, 1 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment

This article was the subject of a Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment, between 26 August 2019 and 4 December 2019. Further details are available on the course page. Student editor(s): Mvardy417. Peer reviewers: ArndtH, AnuBalasubramanian, Stanthewu.

Above undated message substituted from Template:Dashboard.wikiedu.org assignment by PrimeBOT (talk) 16:04, 16 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Bombylius major. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20110713142856/http://www.kendalluk.com/beefly.htm to http://www.kendalluk.com/beefly.htm

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 06:11, 23 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]