Talk:Bombing of Wieluń/GA1

GA Review

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch

Reviewer: Auntieruth55 (talk · contribs) 15:14, 12 June 2018 (UTC)

Good article. I tightened up the lead a bit to clarify. Do you have a picture of the town before bombing? auntieruth (talk) 15:14, 12 June 2018 (UTC)

@Auntieruth55: Not aerial, I am afraid. Take a look at commons:Category:History of Wieluń, in particular commons:Category:Old Wieluń - do you think anything is relevant? --_{Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| reply here} 11:33, 13 June 2018 (UTC)

@Piotrus: I see the problem. Nothing really good. I'd add a "battle" info box to it, and use the first image you have as the box image. It's not really a battle, but it would suffice to add some salient details about time, coordinates, first attack of WWII, etc. Will you do that? Cheers, auntieruth (talk) 14:48, 13 June 2018 (UTC)

Use: Infobox military conflict

@Auntieruth55: Good idea. Infobox added. --_{Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| reply here} 04:08, 14 June 2018 (UTC)

GA review (see here for what the criteria are, and here for what they are not)

1. It is reasonably well written.

   a (prose, spelling, and grammar): b (MoS for lead, layout, word choice, fiction, and lists):

2. It is factually accurate and verifiable.

   a (reference section): b (citations to reliable sources): c (OR): d (copyvio and plagiarism):

3. It is broad in its coverage.

   a (major aspects): b (focused):

4. It follows the neutral point of view policy.

   Fair representation without bias:

5. It is stable.

   No edit wars, etc.:

6. It is illustrated by images and other media, where possible and appropriate.

   a (images are tagged and non-free content have fair use rationales): b (appropriate use with suitable captions):

7. Overall:

   Pass/Fail:

   nice job.