Talk:Bombardment of Cherbourg/GA1
Appearance
GA Review
[edit]GA toolbox |
---|
Reviewing |
Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch
Reviewer: Prabash.A (talk · contribs) 01:30, 27 July 2013 (UTC)
I will get to this in a moment.Prabash.Akmeemana 01:30, 27 July 2013 (UTC)- It looks like the neutrality of the article is disputed as per the facts on my talk page and the constant removal of infantry related content, I will quick fail this review for the time being, once the dispute is solved please resubmit for a second GA assessment, or A-class review beforehand. I will start an RFC on the above comments for a solution to the issue. Prabash.Akmeemana 15:04, 28 July 2013 (UTC)
@Prabash.A:, where is the RfC? What removal of "infantry content" occurred when infantry, naval and air content was added to the stub [naval] Bombardment of Cherbourg?
I have tried to apply for A-Class review per your advice, but I fear I have been unsuccessful. See below. Thanks for any help. TheVirginiaHistorian (talk) 10:44, 26 June 2014 (UTC)