Talk:Boletellus ananas/GA1

GA Review

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch

Reviewer: Rcej (Robert) - talk 05:36, 6 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Nice! Two things:

Why no mycomorphbox?

I thought it would mess up the picture placement by scrunching up the text, but it doesn't look so bad now that it's in there. Sasata (talk) 03:45, 8 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

In taxonomy; sentence "Rolf Singer and colleagues (1992) suggested the name Boletellus coccineus var. coccineus for Boletellus ananas var. ananas." When had Boletellus ananas var. ananas been used previously? Rcej (Robert) - talk 06:10, 7 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

I removed the var. coccineus and var. ananas; the duplication of the species epithet is sometimes used in the literature to make it explicit that its the main taxon and not a variety being discussed, but it's unnecessary here, and no meaning is lost by removing it. Thanks! Sasata (talk) 03:45, 8 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Great! We're on a roll, Mushroom Man ;) Rcej (Robert) - talk 05:59, 8 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Results of review

GA review (see here for criteria)

The article Boletellus ananas passes this review, and has been promoted to good article status. The article is found by the reviewing editor to be deserving of good article status based on the following criteria:

It is reasonably well written.
a (prose): b (MoS):
It is factually accurate and verifiable.
a (references): b (citations to reliable sources): c (OR):
It is broad in its coverage.
a (major aspects): b (focused):
It follows the neutral point of view policy.
Fair representation without bias:
It is stable.
No edit wars, etc.:
It is illustrated by images, where possible and appropriate.
a (images are tagged and non-free images have fair use rationales): b (appropriate use with suitable captions):
Overall:
Pass/Fail: Pass