Talk:Bold Street, Liverpool

Merseyside Mid‑importance

	North West England portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Merseyside, a collaborative effort to improve Wikipedia's coverage of Merseyside-related articles. In so doing it works and collaborates with its mother project WikiProject UK Geography. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and see a list of open tasks. Please also feel free to join in the discussions on the project's talk page.MerseysideWikipedia:WikiProject MerseysideTemplate:WikiProject MerseysideMerseyside articles
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

Highways: United Kingdom Low‑importance

	Roads portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Highways, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of highways on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.HighwaysWikipedia:WikiProject HighwaysTemplate:WikiProject HighwaysHighways articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by the United Kingdom Roads Task Force.

Time warp?

There's something odd about that Daily Post story about the supposed time slips. It says "last year" a woman "wanted to buy a copy of the new novel Trainspotting" at Waterstones, yet Trainspotting was published in 1993 and the story is dated 2003.

Sloppy journalist (thinking a 10-year-old book was published just a year earlier) or another time warp? ;-) 217.155.20.163 (talk) 10:59, 19 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

the newspaper sources linked to for that aspect of the article have disappeared into cyberspace. However, a quick Google for "Bold Street timeslip" shows that the legend (if that's what it is) is alive and well. A recent edit removed any mention of the matter with the comment that it was "absolute rubbish", which seems to me to be a POV edit about claims of the paranormal rather than an objective view in Wikipedia terms about what is or is not notable about Bold Street (if every street in most cities had evolved similar, consistent, urban legends, perhaps it wouldn't be notable, but it does seem to be Bold Street in Liverpool that attracts these stories, which seems to me to be notable enough to warrant a line or two in the longer article). There are reliable enough sources out there (not least the print version of the two newspaper articles - not everything has to be on line) to show that the claims have been made (without necessarily giving an endorsement of objective truth to them), so I suggest it stays in. Ghughesarch (talk) 01:39, 13 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Whether or not the stories are reliable, they are in fact popular stories about Bold Street and so probably deserve some brief mention on this page. JKeck (talk) 01:50, 29 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

never heard of them beyond the Echo about as not worth as Thomas Slemen books. --Kitchen Knife (talk) 23:11, 29 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just added archive links to one external link on Bold Street, Liverpool. Please take a moment to review my edit. If necessary, add {{cbignore}} after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add {{nobots|deny=InternetArchiveBot}} to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/20090626173807/http://www.liverpoolworldheritage.com:80/visitingthewhs/areas/dukestreet/index.asp to http://www.liverpoolworldheritage.com/visitingthewhs/areas/dukestreet/index.asp

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true to let others know.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—^{cyberbot II}_{Talk to my owner:Online} 03:48, 20 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Bold Street, Liverpool. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 13:28, 5 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Bold Street, Liverpool. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20101205222925/http://www.liverpoolmuseums.org.uk:80/maritime/trail/trail_accessible.asp to http://www.liverpoolmuseums.org.uk/maritime/trail/trail_accessible.asp#bol

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 05:24, 2 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]