Talk:Boku no Natsuyasumi/GA1

GA Review

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch

Reviewer: Cukie Gherkin (talk · contribs) 00:55, 23 May 2023 (UTC)

GA review (see here for what the criteria are, and here for what they are not)

1. It is reasonably well written.

   a. (prose, spelling, and grammar):

   b. (MoS for lead, layout, word choice, fiction, and lists):

2. It is factually accurate and verifiable.

   a. (reference section):

   b. (citations to reliable sources):

   c. (OR):

   d. (copyvio and plagiarism):

3. It is broad in its coverage.

   a. (major aspects):

   b. (focused):

4. It follows the neutral point of view policy.

   Fair representation without bias:

5. It is stable.

   No edit wars, etc.:

6. It is illustrated by images and other media, where possible and appropriate.

   a. (images are tagged and non-free content have non-free use rationales):

   b. (appropriate use with suitable captions):

7. Overall:

   Pass/fail:

(Criteria marked are unassessed)

1. [1] Might be worthwhile to discuss the forthcoming fan translation, as well as this source: [2] as a citation for a fan translation being in-demand for this game.
2. Would it be possible to cite that the mobile port has yet to be released? Such as an RS with a "TBA" date?
3. I wonder if it's best to have the creator's feelings on this game be a part of Reception.
4. Be sure to archive the links when you get the chance

None of these would prevent passing, though for the former I think it'd be worthwhile to mention it. - Cukie Gherkin (talk) 10:08, 23 May 2023 (UTC)