Talk:Boita

This article was nominated for deletion on 11 November 2010. The result of the discussion was keep.

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Ships, a project to improve all Ship-related articles. If you would like to help improve this and other articles, please join the project, or contribute to the project discussion. All interested editors are welcome. To use this banner, please see the full instructions.ShipsWikipedia:WikiProject ShipsTemplate:WikiProject ShipsShips articles

India: Odisha / History Low‑importance

	India portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject India, which aims to improve Wikipedia's coverage of India-related topics. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page.IndiaWikipedia:WikiProject IndiaTemplate:WikiProject IndiaIndia articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by WikiProject Odisha (assessed as High-importance).
	This article is supported by the Indian history workgroup (assessed as Mid-importance).

WP:INDIA Banner/Orissa Addition

Note: {{WP India}} Project Banner with Orissa workgroup parameters was added to this article talk page because the article falls under Category:Orissa or its subcategories. Should you feel this addition is inappropriate , please undo my changes and update/remove the relavent categories to the article -- Amartyabag ^TALK2ME 02:56, 4 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Better name?

The name "Boitra" would be an unlikely search term for readers of the English Wikipedia, as would be Voita or Vahitra. The article is about the ships used in Kalinga, the old state centered on modern Orissa. I propose moving to Ships of Kalinga, and making a redirect to that for Ships of Orissa. Those seem more likely search terms. Comments? Aymatth2 (talk) 01:49, 18 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

I agree. I would favour Ships of Orissa. Chaosdruid (talk) 19:56, 26 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Factual accuracy

I'm having some serious doubts about the accuracy of some of the statements in the text - or, to be more precise, the source from which they're derived. The Brahmanda Purana is a religious text, which the tone of the article does not seem to reflect, and the source cited seems very fishy, considering its overall vagueness as well as being the only source I've found that mentions steam engines in Orissa. I'm gonna go ahead and remove the statements in both this article and in Maritime History of Orissa. This means gutting the Construction section. Let me know if I broke something. Whitecroc (talk) 12:16, 27 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 3 external links on Boita. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 01:29, 23 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]