Talk:Boeing E-3 Sentry/GA1

GA Review

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch

Reviewer: Harrison49 (talk • contribs • count) 12:53, 20 September 2011 (UTC)

GA review – see WP:WIAGA for criteria

1. Is it reasonably well written?

   A. Prose quality:

   The article is well written with good prose.

   B. MoS compliance for lead, layout, words to watch, fiction, and lists:

2. Is it factually accurate and verifiable?

   A. References to sources:

   The article is well referenced throughout.

   B. Citation of reliable sources where necessary:

   Reliable sources are used.

   C. No original research:

   There does not appear to be any original research.

3. Is it broad in its coverage?

   A. Major aspects:

   The article covers the major aspects of the subject.

   B. Focused:

   The article remains focused.

4. Is it neutral?

   Fair representation without bias:

   The article maintains a neutral point of view.

5. Is it stable?

   No edit wars, etc:

   The article does not appear to be subject to any edit wars.

6. Does it contain images to illustrate the topic?

   A. Images are copyright tagged, and non-free images have fair use rationales:

   Images are tagged as available in the public domain through the U.S. Air Force

   B. Images are provided where possible and appropriate, with suitable captions:

   Captions are succinct and informative.

7. Overall: A very good article and a good read. Harrison49 (talk) 14:11, 20 September 2011 (UTC)

   Pass or Fail: