Talk:Body Language (Kylie Minogue album)/GA1

GA Review

The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch

Reviewer: MasterOfHisOwnDomain (talk · contribs) 17:19, 26 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Very high quality article; it is well-written (1), verifiable with no original research (2), covers all areas (3), is neutral (4), stable (5) and illustrated appropriately (6). The article is of the same standard as an equivalent GA such as the Kylie Minogue album Fever on which the author also worked.

A few points:

Possibly major issue: Currently receiving a 404 error for citation 15, the entry for the album on Parlophone. It seems that the Music section of that website is no longer available, so a replacement or new link will need to be found.

I have replaced the link. Actually all links to Kylie's site were dead since it got rebooted, so I went ahead and replaced all. I also replaced dead links to PROMUSICAE sites --WonderBoy1998 (talk) 14:55, 27 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

The lede says that the album "explores genres like synthpop, electroclash, R&B, and hip hop." but doesn't list any of these under genre in the infobox.

Actually the genre entry in the infobox is to list the primary genre, which in this case is dance-pop. The rest are simply influences and elements. --WonderBoy1998 (talk) 14:55, 27 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

"Musical styles and lyrical content": "musical works from the 1980s", why can't it be just "music"?
Song sample for "Slow" should probably note that it is a 21-second sample
"Legacy": "Further in his review", think this should be "Later" or "Reflecting on" etc., as currently it doesn't capture the sense he's talking later in time.

Apart from the first point, which if no replacement is found will lead to several uncited statements, I think this is a great article on an album, so well done! MasterOfHisOwnDomain (talk) 17:19, 26 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

@MasterOfHisOwnDomain: I have addressed all of the issues. Thanks for conducting the swift review and for the compliments! :) --WonderBoy1998 (talk) 14:55, 27 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Okay, looking great. I therefore pass the article. Well done! MasterOfHisOwnDomain (talk) 18:11, 28 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you very very much! --WonderBoy1998 (talk) 18:15, 28 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.