Talk:Bodbrane

UK geography Low‑importance

	United Kingdom portal This article falls within the scope of WikiProject UK geography, a user-group dedicated to building a comprehensive and quality guide to places in the United Kingdom on Wikipedia. If you wish to participate, share ideas or merely get tips you can join us at the project page where there are resources, to do lists and guidelines on how to write about settlements.UK geographyWikipedia:WikiProject UK geographyTemplate:WikiProject UK geographyUK geography articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Cornwall Low‑importance

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Cornwall, an attempt to improve and expand Wikipedia coverage of Cornwall and all things Cornish. If you would like to participate, you can edit the article attached to this page, or visit the project member page, where you can join the project and/or contribute to the discussion.CornwallWikipedia:WikiProject CornwallTemplate:WikiProject CornwallCornwall-related articles

Low

This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

See drop-down box for suggested article edit guidelines:

Be bold - if you know something about Cornwall then put it in! We value your contributions and don't be afraid if your spelling isn't great as there are plenty of spelling and grammar experts on clean-up duty!
Articles on settlements in Cornwall should be written using the standard set of headings approved by the UK geography WikiProject's guideline How to write about settlements.
At WikiProject Cornwall we subscribe to the policies laid down by Wikipedia - particularly civility and consensus building. We are aware that the wording on Cornish entries can sometimes be a contentious topic, especially those concerning geography. You don't have to agree with everything but there is no excuse for rudeness and these things are best solved through consensus building and compromise. For more information see WP:CornwallGuideline.
These pages are not platforms for political discussion. Issues relating to Cornish politics should be restricted to those pages that directly deal with these issues (such as Constitutional status of Cornwall, Cornish nationalism, etc) and should not overflow into other articles.
Most of all have fun editing - that's the reason we all do this, right?!

Weasel Words tag

I noticed (at WP:Cornwall) that this article was tagged {{who|date=October 2009}} by User:Zangar.

I assume, of course, that Zangar acted in good faith and may have misunderstood the use of the 'weasel words' tag.

To quote from the WP entry: Weasel words are phrases that are evasive, ambiguous, or misleading. On Wikipedia, the term refers to evasive, ambiguous or misleading attribution. In this case, I'd suggest there was nothing ambiguous or evasive about the statement of fact which was cited to an authoritative source.

I've left a message on Zangar's talk page suggesting if s/he wants to discuss the matter it might be better to do so on the WikiProject Cornwall talk page so that fellow project members can participate and reach a consensus. Andy F (talk) 20:07, 23 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The tag was introduced here [1] - from the edit summary I think Zangar was simply seeking clarification of which John Arundell was being referred to, rather than disputing any attribution. DuncanHill (talk) 20:12, 23 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Oh OK, Duncan. Unfortunately I'm getting a page load error on the Cornovia website. The trouble is, of course, that there was a whole line of John Arundells, a wealthy landowning Cornish family. But going on the dates, it is very likely to be this one John_Arundell_(of_Trerice,_died_1580). What do you reckon? How can we check? Andy F (talk) 20:41, 23 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Might be worth emailing User:Cornovia - he hasn't been active on Wikipedia for a while though, but he's more likely than wnyone I can think of to be able to clear it up. DuncanHill (talk) 20:52, 23 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Sorry for the confusion, it was my misunderstanding of the {{who}} tag. As Duncan notes, I was just trying to get the author or someone who is knowledgeable on the subject to clarify which John Arundell the text referred to. Thanks for pointing it out though, I'll have to find a more appropriate tag for future! Zangar (talk) 02:32, 24 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

You can use {{dn}} to mark links to disambiguation pages. DuncanHill (talk) 02:39, 24 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

That's better - thanks! Zangar (talk) 02:48, 24 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Bodbrane. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20120314172226/http://cornovia.org.uk/ihpnc/a_b.html to http://cornovia.org.uk/ihpnc/a_b.html

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 20:14, 22 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]