Talk:Bob Cranmer

AfSD

I flagged this because the article nevers shows the notability of the subject. I did some searching on Mr. Cranmer and only found that he was the former County Commissioner of Allegheny County, Pennsylvania which doesn't make him notable under WP:POLITICIAN (falls under second-level sub-national when first-level sub-national is the cut off).OlYeller^Talktome 06:56, 28 February 2009 (UTC)

Yes, but this person passes A7 per the assertions of notability in the article. He has been a "County Commissioner of Allegheny County". Though this fails WP:POLITICIAN, this information is enough to pass A7. Since I do not want to edit war, I've placed a {{hangon}} tag on the article and ask the reviewing administrator to add a {{prod}} tag to this article since I agree with OldYeller that this person is non-notable. Cunard (talk) 09:53, 28 February 2009 (UTC)

I don't see how he falls under A7 and you haven't given any proof that he has. I'm fine with waiting though. Edit wars = bad.OlYeller^Talktome 09:57, 28 February 2009 (UTC)

This part of the article:

As being a member of the first Republican majority in Allegheny County government since the Great Depression, Bob is primarily known for his famous "split" with his Republican running mate Larry Dunn and subsequent governing alliance with Democrat Mike Dawida.

shows that this individual passes A7. I doubt that this split was "famous" enough to confer notability, but I believe that that is enough information to pass A7. I have no objections to a prod tag or an AfD, though. I am contesting this speedy deletion because someone might be able to rescue this article by looking at these sources on Google News Archive. Cunard (talk) 10:10, 28 February 2009 (UTC)

Ah, I see. You're right that it could be considered a notable event that he was involved in. I personally don't think it is but that would at least move if from AfSD to AfD. I'll remove the AfSD tag (and the hangon assuming you have no objections).OlYeller^Talktome 10:22, 28 February 2009 (UTC)

You mind checking out those other tags to see if you agree with those?OlYeller^Talktome 10:24, 28 February 2009 (UTC)

COI tag

There is no need for both a COI tag and an autobiography tag; they mean the same thing in this context. Putting both there is simply punitive and doesn't help editors in figuring out page issues. (Same goes for the redundant "citations missing" and "unreferenced" tags.) THF (talk) 18:31, 28 February 2009 (UTC)

Makes sense. I guess I assumed that the template I used would only have each issues once. When I read "unreferenced" I assumed it used the template that says that it didn't have any references not that it didn't have any references and didn't have any inline citations. As for the COI and autobiography tag. I didn't catch that I left both in. My mistakes. I'll be more careful in the future. Thanks for the help.OlYeller^Talktome 18:56, 28 February 2009 (UTC)

Is the photography section noteworthy? OlYeller^Talktome 15:12, 6 April 2009 (UTC)

I see now that it's referenced with a story by the 2 largest newspapers in Pitt. OlYeller^Talktome 15:48, 6 April 2009 (UTC)

Assessment comment

The comment(s) below were originally left at Talk:Bob Cranmer/Comments, and are posted here for posterity. Following several discussions in past years, these subpages are now deprecated. The comments may be irrelevant or outdated; if so, please feel free to remove this section.

Comment(s)

Press [show] to view →

Allegheny County has a larger population and governmental budget than (last time I checked) 15 states. As chairman of the commissioners Cranmer had the commensurate responsibility and notability as the governor of a small state. It is interesting that there is an extensive article of Tom Murphy former mayor of Pittsburgh, (cited in the Cranmer article). Pittsburgh is one of 130 municipalities in Allegheny County (with a population of only 330000 while Allegheny County is 1.2million). Jim Roddey and Dan Onorato both who followed Cranmer also have extensive articles. Mr Cranmer received extensive coverage during the 1990s in the Tri-state Pittsburgh media market television radio and print. His political victory over one of the last remaining (depression era) Democratic political machines was historic in Pennsylvania and made the national media at the time. He also was a key player in one of the only initiatives by a city/county to successfully construct "two" major league sports stadiums on budget without a tax increase (see: Plan B Pittsburgh Post-Gazette). (talk) 00:01, 2 March 2009 (UTC)) == Print References. == Requested Print References: http://www.post-gazette.com/forum/19990107edcran1.asp http://www.post-gazette.com/forum/19980604bedrad1.asp http://www.post-gazette.com/forum/19980901edcran1.asp http://www.post-gazette.com/columnists/19990619roddy.asp http://www.post-gazette.com/election/20030215dunn404elect2p2.asp http://www.post-gazette.com/neigh_south/20021231s51square1231p4.asp http://www.post-gazette.com/columnists/19990107brian.asp http://www.post-gazette.com/neigh_south/19990515brentwood3.asp (151.201.23.146 (talk) 17:18, 2 March 2009 (UTC)) (talk) 17:14, 2 March 2009 (UTC)) —Preceding unsigned comment added by 151.201.23.146 (talk) 17:08, 2 March 2009 (UTC) Editorial: Cranmer's exit http://www.post-gazette.com/forum/19990107edcran1.asp A statesmanlike withdrawal for the public good Thursday, January 07, 1999 In the space of three years, he sent shock waves through Allegheny County, dumped his political running mate, worked for reform and development, then Tuesday denied himself a shot at the county's new top political job. Say what you like, but Bob Cranmer is not your average county commissioner. Unlike most politicians, he was no government fixture when he first ran countywide in 1995. That was the year he and Republican incumbent Larry Dunn shattered the political firmament by seating the first GOP majority in half a century in the Allegheny County commissioners' office. Two months later, they unfortunately made good on their campaign promises; they cut property taxes by 20 percent and froze assessments for five years. The fact that they had not figured out how to work such dramatic revenue losses into the county budget did not still their hand. Hundreds of layoffs, a depleted savings account, a judge's court order and a reduced bond rating later, the budget is finally on firmer ground. But it took a political realignment to create stability, a major move in which Commissioner Cranmer repudiated the just-say-no politics of Larry Dunn and formed a new working majority with Democratic Commissioner Mike Dawida. The new allegiance also laid bare, once and for all, Commissioner Dunn's anti-development, anti-future and anti-Pittsburgh viewpoint. It's a message, unfortunately, that he is twisting into an "anti-elites" platform that he'll try to ride to his party's nomination for county executive. Some Republicans may still castigate Bob Cranmer for his break with Larry Dunn, but by shifting gears and repairing the county budget, by seeking (rather than evading) accurate property assessments and by advancing the cause of major capital construction, Commissioner Cranmer put people over politics. With Tuesday's announcement, he may have done the same again. By staying in the GOP primary for county executive, Commissioner Cranmer (after splitting votes with businessman David Christopher and anticipated candidate Jim Roddey) would have served only to clear a path for the nomination of Mr. Dunn. But by thinning the field and working toward the day when Republicans have a single alternative to the policies of ill-conceived tax cuts, reactionary thinking and government-as-usual, Commissioner Cranmer has made the ultimate political sacrifice. If that is the mark of a citizen-lawmaker - to be honest, to spurn patronage, to reform the public sector and then get out - this commissioner has been one such leader. Allegheny County could use a few more Bob Cranmers. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 67.165.58.69 (talk) 03:34, 2 March 2009 (UTC) Editorial: Cranmer's county http://www.post-gazette.com/forum/19980901edcran1.asp He took a political risk and got government back on track Tuesday, September 01, 1998 It's hard to say whether Commissioner Bob Cranmer achieved his political objective last Thursday night in delivering Allegheny County's first "state of the county" speech. The red, white and blue bunting, the rented Soldiers & Sailors Memorial Hall and the brass band playing "The Star-Spangled Banner" may have been a bit over the top. But no one can fault Mr. Cranmer for explaining the lesson and the merits of putting policy over politics. The Republican commissioner, who will pass his chairman's gavel to Democratic colleague Mike Dawida this Thursday, knows all too well the pain and risk of an intra-party split. He and running mate Larry Dunn, of course, broke 60 years of Democratic domination with their stunning election in 1995. Then they nearly broke the county. On the new majority's first day in office, the commissioners cut property taxes by 20 percent (on top of a 6 percent cut by the departing Democrats) and froze property assessments for five years. Trouble was, they had no detailed plan for how to pay for either consequence. Soon enough, the county was depleting its cash reserves, laying off workers, freezing pay, getting its bond ratings downgraded, letting the park grass grow and being sued by taxpayers for an assessment system that gave breaks to well-to-do property owners. It told the city, in effect, that it was on its own and that Mayor Murphy shouldn't look to the county for help on major capital projects. The turmoil was actually worse than that. The Republican duo began pushing the privatization of county agencies, then backed off. The commissioners hired Budget Director Rowan Miranda away from the city, then drove him out with the administration's sheer ineptitude. Commissioner Dunn tried to load the Port Authority with political hires and, soon enough, PAT's longtime and much-praised chief, William Millar, was lost to a job in Washington. Somewhere in that inglorious second year of the new majority, Mr. Cranmer realized that this wasn't government, this was a travesty. In the summer of 1997, he made what he termed "one of the most important decisions in my administration, in my career, in my life." And, in the history of Allegheny County. He split with Republican Dunn and formed a new majority with Democrat Dawida. The year that followed was not exactly the Age of Aquarius, but the county got its financial situation under control, it began reforming the property assessment system, it resumed its partnership with the city and even the grass got cut. It may have a way to go, but county government's credibility is on the way to being restored. It all began with a daring leap taken by Bob Cranmer, the former party chairman who was bold enough to reject his party's top elected official when he saw the politics overtaking the policy. No one knows where the gamble will ultimately lead Commissioner Cranmer, but it was a decision that led Allegheny County in the right direction. Editorial -- Cranmer's leadership http://www.post-gazette.com/forum/19980604bedrad1.asp The commissioner made a tough, necessary call on RAD Thursday, June 04, 1998 Commissioner Bob Cranmer has no shortage of political enemies. He infuriated Democrats with his surprise election in 1995. He enraged Republicans by breaking with ineffectual colleague Larry Dunn. And, this week, chances are good he picked up a few new adversaries. That's because he made a tough call -- driven more by the future of his region than the future of his career -- on one of his appointments to the Allegheny Regional Asset District board. Commissioner Cranmer named Fred Baker, a businessman, to the RAD board in 1996. On Monday, Mr. Baker quit the board under pressure from the commissioner because the two differed on a momentous issue that will get a RAD vote next month: Should the board convert the $10 million it allocates annually to Three Rivers Stadium into $13.4 million a year to help pay for Plan B, which will build two new stadiums and a new convention center? To both men the answer is plain: Mr. Cranmer says yes, Mr. Baker says no. Exit Mr. Baker. To a lot of politicians around Allegheny County, the commissioner's removal of a potential obstacle to an $803 million development program -- something this region doesn't see every day -- is a bald political power play ... an end-run around the public will ... the stuff of Boss Tweed and Davey Lawrence (to paraphrase Larry Dunn). But for all the crying they do in their civics books, that's what people hear from any politician who ends up on the short end of a vote in Washington, Harrisburg or Pittsburgh City Council. The people who think Commissioner Cranmer was wrong to replace a wayward board member who, by law, serves at his pleasure, are the same people who have been fighting these projects since at least last year. Don Walko. Frank Gigliotti. Dave Levdansky. Richard Olasz. They were against building them with a new half-cent regional sales tax. Now they are against building them with no new taxes. It's time someone asked them what they are for. Bob Cranmer knows what he is for. He and Commissioner Mike Dawida and Mayor Murphy, along with thousands of average citizens and civic leaders, are for a region that renews and revives itself. One that attracts businesses, creates jobs, offers quality of life and, most important, has a future. That is an entirely appropriate use of public dollars -- and Pittsburgh's metro competitors keep investing in themselves, even if this region doesn't. One more point. Mr. Baker, and those who have turned his resignation into a cause celebre, are trying to portray the Plan B vote as something unprecedented, something out of the realm of the RAD. What hypocrisy. From its inception, RAD has given money not only to Three Rivers Stadium, but also to other regional assets like the Civic Arena, Heinz Hall and Benedum Center -- places where millionaire athletes, millionaire singers, millionaire musicians and millionaire actors perform for the paying public. How did Mr. Baker, whose conscience is so tortured by the notion of using RAD money for stadium construction, vote on two RAD budgets that contained such "millionaire handouts"? Yes and yes. Brentwood, county officials show plans for a new shopping center Saturday, May 15, 1999 By Al Lowe, Tri-State Sports & News Service Brentwood and Allegheny County officials, along with Giant Eagle representatives, were able to announce all the specifics yesterday regarding a $28 million development project designed to replace the current Brentwood-Whitehall Shopping Center. They knew all the answers except one. It still does not have a name. Brentwood school officials had rejected Giant Eagle's proposed name of Brentwood Town Center for the 10-acre complex of office and retail buildings which will have a 73,000-square-foot Giant Eagle as its centerpiece. So Brentwood Mayor Ron Arnoni yesterday announced a contest to name the development with a $500 Giant Eagle gift certificate as the prize. It will be judged by a committee of Arnoni, Dennis Troy from the county's Department of Economic Development, school board President Jim Edwards, council President Nancy Patton and Dick Nimtz, a giant Eagle representative. Officials also announced the time line for development for the project. In 1999, the post office's bulk mail facility and a connector road beside St. Peter's Episcopal Church will be constructed. Plans call for the demolition of the Brentwood-Whitehall Shopping Center and the construction of an 83,600-square-foot office/retail and 20,000-square-foot retail buildings during the following year. The new Giant Eagle will be built in 2001, along with the construction of a 3,000-square-foot retail building. Commissioner Bob Cranmer said he had started the ball rolling when he sought a new grocery store for the community during his term on Brentwood council from 1991 to 1995. This led to the formation of the Brentwood Economic Task Force and the Brentwood Economic Development Corporation, both now defunct, and the newly formed Economic Development South, a nonprofit development corporation, not just for Brentwood but also for Whitehall and Baldwin Borough. Cranmer said he moved his family here in 1988, the same year Horne's and G.C. Murphy left the shopping center, which many years ago was considered the premiere shopping center in the South Hills. When he became county commissioner, the development department knew the redevelopment of the shopping center site had high priority and every week he checked on its progress. The cost of the project will be primarily financed by the owner, Giant Eagle's development companies, and approximately $3.6 million will be through a tax increment financing agreement between Brentwood Borough, Brentwood schools and Allegheny County. http://www.post-gazette.com/neigh_south/19990515brentwood3.asp Cranmer, Dunn strengths vary Thursday, January 07, 1999 By Brian O'Neill No good deed goes unpunished. Commissioner Bob Cranmer saved Allegheny County from financial meltdown a year and a half ago when he walked away from his incompetent Republican colleague Larry Dunn and joined with Democrat Mike Dawida to restore sanity to government. Since then, the county bond rating, which had been in free fall, has stabilized. The budget is balanced. And yet it is Dunn, not Cranmer, who remains in the running for the Republican nomination to be our first county executive in a new system of government. Such is political life. It's no mystery why Cranmer is persona non grata in Republican circles. By placing second and third in the 1995 general election, Dunn and Cranmer gave Republicans control of this county for the first time in more than 60 years, and they hit the ground slashing. Taxes were cut 20 percent the day they took power, fulfilling a popular campaign pledge. Then came the hard part, the governing part, and Dunn just isn't cut out for that. Anyone can do the popular thing, but when taxes are cut, less money comes in, so programs and people have to be cut. This is where Dunn choked. At the 11th hour, he ditched a plan to privatize the Kane hospitals, which won him the gratitude of Kane employees, but got the county no closer to a balanced budget. Something had to be done, and Dunn doesn't have it in him to make tough calls. The $76.6 million budget surplus the Republicans inherited was fast disappearing, Wall Street bond rating agencies were downgrading county bonds, and Dunn coped in his standard way. He went into denial. Government gridlocked. So Cranmer changed partners. He allied with Dawida, and they struggled out of the budget quicksand. It wasn't easy. People were hurt. There were employee buyouts and layoffs. But Cranmer, who announced Tuesday he would not run for county executive, will be leaving whoever wins that seat a real government. For that, and his support for county funding of stadiums, Cranmer might never be forgiven. Dunn, who spends most of his work week politicking, having not much to do on Grant Street, has made a lot of friends with all his handshakes and dodges of responsibility. He's a master at playing the good but betrayed party soldier. It's telling that Dunn still was portraying himself Tuesday as the anti-establishment man who can lead this county out of decline - a brazen stance for someone with 10 years in office. Cranmer, meantime, can't buy a break. He spent more than $300,000 last year on TV commercials and party mailings and even an unprecedented state of the county address at Soldiers & Sailors Memorial Hall. He delivered what he believes is "a great Republican story" of a leaner, meaner government. When the polls came back, Cranmer's negatives among Republicans were higher than ever. So he's leaving the primary field to Dunn, former county GOP Chairman David Christopher and - maybe, maybe, it always seems to be maybe with this man - businessman James Roddey. Democrats, meantime, likely will choose between Dawida or county Coroner Cyril Wecht as their nominee for county executive. Cranmer can concentrate on government rather than politics this year, while Dunn does the opposite. That, at least, is as it should be. Each man to his calling. http://www.post-gazette.com/columnists/19990107brian.asp Plan B was the designation given to efforts to fund the construction of two new stadiums for the the Pirates and the Steelers, plus expand the David L. Lawrence Convention Center, after the failure of the first plan. (A drawing of the proposed Pirates' stadium is at right.) Before there was Plan B, there was another proposal to increase the sales tax in the region to help pay for those projects. That plan was voted down in a referendum, and what came next became known as Plan B. Here is some of the news, background and details on Plan B, compiled from articles published in the Post-Gazette. The Steelers have settled on an architect for the new $230 million football stadium on the North Shore, and it's the same design firm that will do PNC Park for the Pirates. Common Pleas Judge Robert P. Horgos dismisses a lawsuit against Plan B funding filed by local lawyer Allen Brunwasser, a sharp critic of Plan B. City and county officials say it's too late to revise Plan B and build a new ice hockey arena for the Penguins as part of the coming expansion of the David L. Lawrence Convention Center. In a PG Sunday Forum article, Post-Gazette Associate Editor Paul R. Flora takes a critical look at the economic studies that drive important regional policy decisions, including "Plan B." After five hours of debate, the Regional Asset District board approves local funding for an $809 million plan to build two new stadiums and triple the size of the David L. Lawrence Convention Center. The Pirates want to break ground for their new baseball stadium by April 1 so the park can be ready for play starting April 1, 2001. Now that city and county officials agree with the Steelers and the Pirates about how much the teams will pay toward new stadiums, the Regional Asset District board will decide whether $13.4 million per year in county sales tax revenue may be used for the next 30 years to help underwrite the stadiums and expansion of the convention center. After agreeing to ante up millions more, the Pirates and Steelers have reached a deal with local officials to build new stadiums that will keep the teams in Pittsburgh until at least 2031. County Commissioner Bob Cranmer says that if the Steelers help sell "stadium investment bonds," as they indicated they would, it would count toward their share of the $803 million city/county proposal to build baseball and football stadiums and enlarge David L. Lawrence Convention Center. Pittsburgh and Allegheny County officials are pushing to reach agreements with the Pirates and Steelers on financing of new stadiums. Steelers President Dan Rooney says that city and county officials are trying to force his franchise to assume too much of the financial burden for Plan B. Allegheny County Commissioner Bob Cranmer says talks with the Steelers are going well. An Op-Ed column by Allegheny County Commissioner Michael M. Dawida: Let's grow with Plan B. City Councilman Jim Ferlo thinks that the mayor is not doing enough to get a portion of Regional Asset District funds for Plan B. Property needed for the Pirates' new ballpark should be acquired by the end of the year, Mayor Murphy says. The view from the Ridge -- or, what does the governor think? What did PG columnist Brian O'Neill think? And has he changed his mind? What is Plan C? Models of the proposed new stadium for the Pirates. For background on the drive to build new stadiums and other projects, read PG articles that preceded last year's failed attempt to pass a sales tax increase to fund construction. The following articles were designed to answer questions about Plan B. 5 percent ticket surcharge explained to fans -- The first installment in a series of articles designed to answer questions about Plan B. This installment looks at ticket surcharges. City and county officials have proposed a 5 percent surcharge on Pirates and Steelers tickets to raise $22 million of the $803 million projected cost of the projects. Plan B may tax visiting players -- Installment Two: A tax on the salaries of professional athletes who live out of state. City and county officials have proposed a 1 percent tax on that portion of an athlete's salary related to his play in Pittsburgh. Record price for stadium naming rights is $100 million -- Installment Three: The sale of naming rights to the stadiums. State funds for Plan B still not locked in -- Installment Four: State funding for the projects. Stadium resource: asset district funds -- Installment Five: Regional Asset District funding for Plan B and how it would affect RAD funding of cultural institutions. A closer look at Plan B -- Installment Six: The projected 38,000-seat capacity of the proposed $228 million ballpark on the North Shore, which the Pirates have said is necessary for the survival of baseball here. Fancy seating: a revolution in sports finance -- Installment Seven: Premium seating -- luxury boxes and club seats. Steelers not awash with cash for stadium -- Installment Eight: The Steelers' financial position and how it affects the amount the team will contribute toward stadium construction. Construction costs for the projects probably will be higher with delays -- Installment Nine: The cost of the three projects. Cost overrun issues remain to be decided -- Installment 10: What happens if there are cost overruns should both a baseball and football stadium be built. Stadium building plans on fast track -- Installment 11: Probable timetables for accomplishing an ambitious building plan. Teams have several payment options -- Installment 12: How teams might fund their share of stadium costs. Plan B may turn to private managers -- Installment 13: The prospects for privatizing the convention center. Novel way to raise funds on table -- Installment 14: A plan to raise $45 million toward the project costs by selling portions of the new baseball and football stadiums to private investors. Sequence of funding is critical for Plan B -- Final installment: How the funding dominoes would fall to get the deal done and why the sequence of funding plans is critical. http://www.post-gazette.com/planb/default.aspBrentwood Whitehall Center tenants to move into new complex Tuesday, December 31, 2002 By Al Lowe, Tri-State Sports & News Service The Whitehall Center, a Brentwood fixture since October 1940, will be demolished early next month. And seven center tenants will move to two newly constructed retail/professional buildings that are part of the $30 million Towne Square complex scheduled to replace the center and the now demolished Brentwood-Whitehall Shopping Center. Other tenants will move in later in 2003. Razing the Whitehall Center should take 45 days, developer Bill Krahe of Echo Real Estate said. Tenants of the two new buildings will include: Rotelli Pizza Pasta Perfect, Quizno's Classic Subs, Vision Gallery, a state liquor store, Definitely You, Sally Beauty Supply, Radio Shack, Orthodonics Association, Oasis, H & R Block, Parkvale Savings, L.A. Nails, E.R.B. Physical Therapy, Association of Ophthalmology, a Little Nippers Pizzeria and Hair Etc. The new Giant Eagle anchor superstore will be similar to the one in The Waterfront, with a pharmacy, cafe, Farmers Market and Eagle Nest Center for children to play in, Krahe said. He hopes to have it built by November. A new Dollar Bank also will be built. A new Wendy's Old Fashioned Hamburgers opened on the site two weeks ago. Delays in the project were caused by arrangements for tax increment financing and the collapse of protracted negotiations with the post office that caused postal operations to move temporarily from Brentwood. "Still, I never had any doubts [about the project]," said Krahe, whose involvement began in 1996. Local officials said they were delighted. "Last Saturday my wife and I ate at Wendy's. It was perfect," council President Fred Swanson said. "So far Bill Krahe has lived up to everything he said he was going to do. So many people are asking me when everything is going to open. Everyone around here is really excited. The shopping center has come a long way." Mayor Ken Lockhart said the project will be the cornerstone of local development efforts, including the plan to revitalize Route 51. He said he was particularly happy because "that corner was so blighted for so many years." "In 1989 I was out of town on business when my wife Lesa told me on the phone Horne's and Murphy's were closing," former Councilman and county Commissioner Bob Cranmer said. He immediately wondered what would happen to his property values. He visited a council meeting to express his concern and found there was no plan in place. In 1991 he ran for council saying he wanted to bring a grocery store to Brentwood. After his election Cranmer found his campaign promise was easier said than done when grocery chains he contacted disparaged the condition of the current shopping center and the topography of the land where it sat. He and planning commission member Dennis Troy were instrumental in creating an economic development corporation that was OK'd by council, thanks to the lobbying of council members Sonya Vernau and Nancy Patton. The corporation later became the nonprofit Economic Development South. Once a developer was interested in the project, Cranmer, later a county commissioner, had county planning offices devote time to making the dream a reality. "Bill Krahe has been the epitome of determination and doggedness since the very beginning," Cranmer said. "If I have done anything for this borough, it was keeping my campaign promise and attracting a grocery to the community. Every time I drive by, it gives me goose bumps." http://www.post-gazette.com/neigh_south/20021231s51square1231p4.asp Dunn becomes Democrat Former county commissioner enters county controller's race Saturday, February 15, 2003 By James O'Toole, Post-Gazette Politics Editor Launching what could be an improbable return to the Courthouse, former county Commissioner Larry Dunn switched his party registration to pursue the Democratic nomination for county controller. Dunn, a former Republican county chairman who served three terms on the Board of Commissioners, said he had decided to bolt his political home because of his increasing estrangement from the local GOP establishment. "I did this after seeing Allegheny County Republican leaders repeatedly ignore the clearly expressed will of the voters by building expensive stadiums that the public had rejected," Dunn said at a news conference yesterday in the Downtown office of his consulting firm. "I did this after seeing a Republican administration break their word to the voters by raising both property assessments and taxes each year for the past three years, driving more and more of our citizens from the homes they have spent their lives saving for." That administration is headed by Jim Roddey, the man who halted Dunn's political career, at least temporarily, four years ago by defeating him in an acrimonious Republican primary for chief executive. Roddey said he's not too concerned about the possibility that, if they were both elected in November, Dunn would be sniping at him from the controller's office, which is just down the hallway from the chief executive's suite. "I don't think there is much chance that will happen," Roddey said. "The voters of Allegheny County, the last time Larry ran, were pretty clear about how they felt about his stewardship." But if Dunn were to prevail in this surprising bid for controller, it would not be the first unpredictable turn in his public career. Dunn served three terms as a Republican commissioner before the county switched to the county executive form of government in 2000. In winning his final term, Dunn shocked the county's Democratic establishment by leading the first Republican takeover of the majority of the board of commissioners in six decades. That GOP reign was cut short, however, when his running mate, Bob Cranmer, weary of the controversies and budget problems that dogged that administration, turned from Dunn to form an alliance with Democrat Michael Dawida halfway through that term. Competition for the controller's spot was opened with the decision of the incumbent Democrat, Dan Onorato, to forego a re-election bid in favor of a challenge to Roddey in the executive's race. The prospective vacancy had already drawn several Democratic candidates, including county Councilman James Simms, city Councilman Jim Motznik and Mark Flaherty, the son of former Commissioner James Flaherty. Among others considering bids for the Democratic nomination, according to city Controller Tom Flaherty, the party chairman, are John Conley of Baldwin, who lost to Onorato in the Democratic primary four years ago, and Lisa Fera, a Democratic committeewoman who is also from Baldwin. So far, no Republican has announced for the post. The potentially large Democratic field presents an opportunity for Dunn, who brings established name recognition to a race that might not demand a majority for victory. "He can't get to 50 percent, but he might be able to get to 30 or 35 percent," one Republican said of Dunn's prospects. "He's not to be underestimated," said Tom Flaherty. "He knows his way around on the campaign trail. At this point, it's a fluid race with no real favorite for the [Democratic Party] endorsement or the primary." Dunn said yesterday that he had cultivated widespread friendships among Democrats while in office. And, several politicians pointed out, there may be no figure in the county who has attended more chicken dinners, Boy Scout award banquets, bingos and funeral homes over the years. "He's famous for going to every little event in the county," noted Onorato. "That's what he did as a commissioner." Onorato, like Tom Flaherty, said he welcomed the political veteran to their party, but the executive candidate was more skeptical of Dunn's chances in his new party. "It's going to be very difficult for him," Onorato said. "The core support he has in the Republican Party can't help him." Dunn made his announcement in an office festooned with political memorabilia including pictures of himself with Republican luminaries such as Sen. Arlen Specter. Behind him was a white cap emblazoned with the black logo, "5%." It referred to his oft-stated proposal to cap assessment-driven tax increases on individual properties to five percent annually. Dunn distributed hundreds of similar caps at public meetings across the county in the two years before the 1995 race that brought GOP control of the Courthouse. In promising to continue his assault on the county's property tax system, Dunn pointed to the fact that he was the only commissioner who voted against the contract with Sabre Systems, the private firm who's reassessment of property values is a continuing font of controversy. In contrast to the incumbent controller, Dunn is neither an accountant nor a lawyer. He maintained, nonetheless, that his background as commissioner has given him ample insight into the county's finances. He said he would use it to find cuts in county spending. Since leaving office nearly four years ago, Dunn has operated a government affairs consulting firm, specializing in tax assessment issues. Dunn wouldn't estimate his campaign budget. "I won't be able to raise the kind of money I did as commissioner," he said. "but I think, in a crowded field, I can raise the money I need." http://www.post-gazette.com/election/20030215dunn404elect2p2.asp What's Dunn is surely done Saturday, June 19, 1999 By Dennis Roddy I have been trying for some weeks now to insinuate myself into the sanctum sanctorum of the Hon. Larry Dunn, public servant, Republican stalwart and sore loser, but for reasons he will not make clear, the great man declines to see me. Dunn was, for years, the solitary pest control agent in a county frightfully infested with the species Democratus Liberalis. He voted against tax increases, for which I am grateful. He tortured Tom Foerster and Pete Flaherty, always a vast entertainment. He opposed public subscription for new sports stadiums, which greatly annoyed my employers but distracted them sufficiently to allow me to laze about the office like an overfed cat. How I shall prosper without this man I do not know. Moments after his defeat last month, Dunn, unwilling to break his tradition of never rising above an occasion, took to the podium to denounce the Downtown establishment, his party and the lackeys of the media octopus. Like good citizens, we sought out an explanation of how we had harmed him. He would not come near. Instead, he issued a dispatch that said, in part: "[I]t has been a horrible three years, with the Downtown print media constantly distorting all of the positive things I have done," he said, disregarding the fact that the Downtown print media all but threw Foerster and Flaherty off a bridge to open the way for Dunn's ascendancy at the big monkey house on Grant Street. Bad enough that these low-brow booze-hounds from the Downtown newspapers disfigured his record. His dispatch included a grievance that bordered on the metaphysical: "Then, this primary election brought the malicious character assassination by my opponent, not just distorting my accomplishment, but even my personal appearance." Cazart! Someone has distorted Larry's appearance? He doesn't always look like that? They blinded us with political science! It is always a painful thing to watch the disintegration of a perfectly mediocre man. As jollier types broke ground yesterday for one of the stadiums around which Dunn's decline pivoted, he remained in his office, uninvited. Such Republicans as could be exposed to direct sunlight fluttered around his primary opponent, a silver-haired man who sounds like Rhett Butler and cannot spell "Roddy" correctly. This had to hurt. In recent days Dunn has given limited responses during the weekly commissioners' post-game show outside the luxurious Gold Room at the County Courthouse. But requests for a tete-a-tete concerning his views on the county's future, his plans for days to come, which of my colleagues he plans to shoot if martial law is declared before the year ends -- all go without reply. So I must bid adieu to Larry without the congenial exit interview many another public man has managed in the face of rejection. Instead, we are left with fond memories of the man: schmoozing blue-haired ladies at committee gatherings; pumping the arms of middle-brow executives, his eyes darting about for some clue to their names; gripping, at the zenith of his career, the chairman's gavel as if he might, at any moment, deliver a mighty blow to his left thumb. Au revoir, mon cheri. I shall always remember. http://www.post-gazette.com/columnists/19990619roddy.asp —Preceding unsigned comment added by 67.165.58.69 (talk) 02:17, 2 March 2009 (UTC)

Last edited at 01:13, 20 July 2012 (UTC). Substituted at 09:53, 29 April 2016 (UTC)