Talk:Bob Brady

This article must adhere to the biographies of living persons (BLP) policy, even if it is not a biography, because it contains material about living persons. Contentious material about living persons that is unsourced or poorly sourced must be removed immediately from the article and its talk page, especially if potentially libellous. If such material is repeatedly inserted, or if you have other concerns, please report the issue to this noticeboard.

If you are a subject of this article, or acting on behalf of one, and you need help, please see this help page.

Biography: Politics and Government

	Biography portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Biographybiography articles
	This article is supported by the politics and government work group (assessed as Low-importance).

Pennsylvania Mid‑importance

	Pennsylvania portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Pennsylvania, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Pennsylvania on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.PennsylvaniaWikipedia:WikiProject PennsylvaniaTemplate:WikiProject PennsylvaniaPennsylvania articles
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

Philadelphia Mid‑importance

	Philadelphia portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Philadelphia, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Philadelphia on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.PhiladelphiaWikipedia:WikiProject PhiladelphiaTemplate:WikiProject PhiladelphiaPhiladelphia articles
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

U.S. Congress

	United States portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject U.S. Congress, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of the United States Congress on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.U.S. CongressWikipedia:WikiProject U.S. CongressTemplate:WikiProject U.S. CongressU.S. Congress articles
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.
	This article is about one (or many) person(s).

Corruption counts

In his 21 years as Chairman of Philadelphia's Democratic Party, officials of that party have faced over a thousand federal corruption counts.[1]

Can someone expand or explain this? 50 counts/year seems high, but I don't know what the "normal" amount of corruption charges for a 20-year period is for a major but not world-class city. Has Brady been criticised for not stopping this, or accused of facilitating this?

Could use a source too. This was entered by 68.84.221.71 (talk · contribs · WHOIS), one-time anon editor, who also called Brady's district "heavily gerymandered". / edgarde 19:46, 26 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Free Speech

Brady has, according to Politics Daily, said he will introduce a bill to ban saying anything that "could be perceived" as threatening or inciting violence against a member of Congress, regardless of whether actual incitement or threats took place. This is presumably so that anyone who draws a picture of a congressional district with a bullseye on it (i.e. Sarah Palin), or says "They [the Republicans] bring a kinfe to the fight, we'll bring a gun" like Barack Obama did, can be prosecuted for doing so. Doesn't this count as a noteworthy stance on free speech? http://www.politicsdaily.com/2011/01/10/in-wake-of-giffords-shooting-congress-on-high-alert-but-intent/?icid=main%7Chp-laptop%7Cdl1%7Csec3_lnk3%7C194614 please view my source.

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 4 external links on Bob Brady. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20090419063456/http://seventy.org/Downloads/2009_Citizen%27s_Guide.pdf to http://www.seventy.org/Downloads/2009_Citizen%27s_Guide.pdf
Corrected formatting/usage for http://www.politicspa.com/FEATURES/Best%26Worst.htm
Corrected formatting/usage for http://politicsmagazine.com/uploads/Image/Politics_PA_influencers_web.pdf
Corrected formatting/usage for http://www.pa-report.com/uploaded_pdf/PA%20Report%20100%20-%20Jan%2023%2C%202009.pdf

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 11:32, 22 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 3 external links on Bob Brady. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 14:10, 20 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Infobox image/dispute resolution (resolved)

@82.29.185.75:

Alright, it's clear we have differing opinions about the image that should be used in the infobox. As I'd like to avoid having to go to WP:AN/3 about this, I'd like to pursue dispute resolution.

I believe that, for all government officials (past and present), their official picture taken while in office (the one next to the American flag, in this case) should be used in their infobox. This is based on precedent from a majority of articles on government officials, especially in the United States. You obviously believe otherwise.

I'd like to reach a compromise for this so action by admins is not necessitated. Perhaps we could place your image somewhere else in the article, or we can use it for the infobox and put the previous image in a section related to his time in his position?

Thank you. Kirbanzo (talk) 18:24, 3 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

I have looked over the history and the image I have put back into the article is the one that has been used for years. The image you have attempted to place in the article is years out of date and isn't what Brady looks like now. I therefore suggest we stick to the one that I have put back in, which has been used for years. 82.29.185.75 (talk) 18:35, 3 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

If article history suggest so. I'll grab the other image and put it under an appropriate section. Kirbanzo (talk) 18:43, 3 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]