Talk:Bob & Rose

Television: British / Episode coverage Low‑importance

	Television portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Television, a collaborative effort to develop and improve Wikipedia articles about television programs. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page where you can join the discussion. To improve this article, please refer to the style guidelines for the type of work.TelevisionWikipedia:WikiProject TelevisionTemplate:WikiProject Televisiontelevision articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by the British television task force.
	This article is supported by the Episode coverage task force.

LGBTQ+ studies

This article is of interest to WikiProject LGBTQ+ studies, which tries to ensure comprehensive and factual coverage of all LGBTQ-related issues on Wikipedia. For more information, or to get involved, please visit the project page or contribute to the discussion.LGBTQ+ studiesWikipedia:WikiProject LGBTQ+ studiesTemplate:WikiProject LGBTQ+ studiesLGBTQ+ studies articles

Greater Manchester

	Greater Manchester portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Greater Manchester, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Greater Manchester on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Greater ManchesterWikipedia:WikiProject Greater ManchesterTemplate:WikiProject Greater ManchesterGreater Manchester articles
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.

'&' or 'and' - move to 'Bob & Rose'?

Most of the sources on the internet indicate that the title used an ampersand and not the word 'and'. Shouldn't this article therefore be at Bob & Rose not Bob and Rose? --GracieLizzie 13:57, 24 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I don't have this one on DVD — can anybody check the titles for a definitive answer? If it's an ampersand in the titles then it should of course be moved, I agree. Angmering 15:50, 24 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

It's definitely an ampersand in the title. Suzarella (talk) 21:08, 13 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Based on a true story

I'm sure RTD said in his interview with Mark Lawson that Bob & Rose is based on a true story - an acquantance of RTD's (who works in broadcasting, IIRC, though he didn't name names) who fell in love and married a woman, despite being (until then!) gay. I thought this might be noteworthy, with a proper citation, in light of the "Controversy" section. David (talk) 22:16, 24 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Copyright problem removed

Prior content in this article duplicated one or more previously published sources. The material was copied from: http://www.logotv.com/shows/dyn/bob_and_rose/episode.jhtml?episodeID=91948 and http://www.cduniverse.com/search/xx/movie/pid/6651015/a/Bob+%26+Rose+-+The+Complete+Series.htm. Infringing material has been rewritten or removed and must not be restored, unless it is duly released under a compatible license. (For more information, please see "using copyrighted works from others" if you are not the copyright holder of this material, or "donating copyrighted materials" if you are.) For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or published material; such additions will be deleted. Contributors may use copyrighted publications as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences or phrases. Accordingly, the material may be rewritten, but only if it does not infringe on the copyright of the original or plagiarize from that source. Please see our guideline on non-free text for how to properly implement limited quotations of copyrighted text. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously, and persistent violators will be blocked from editing. While we appreciate contributions, we must require all contributors to understand and comply with these policies. Thank you. Minima c (talk) 10:26, 6 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

In further detail, the copyrighted content was added here by LeighMichelle75, in which I've given her an only warning here. Minima c (talk) 10:26, 6 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Episodes #3-6?

Any chance someone could supply synopsis for the rest of the episodes? 69.125.134.86 (talk) 17:28, 28 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]