Talk:Bob's Burgers/GA1

GA Review

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch

Reviewer: Kww (talk · contribs) 23:35, 6 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Lead section

Fails to summarize article.

April 7, 2011 data only in lead, not contained in article.
"Human Flesh" viewership only in lead, not contained in article.
Mention of "59th" place violates WP:NUMERO, not mentioned in article, and contains an irrelevant comparison to other series.

Plot

This section says very little about the plot.

Original pilot

One massive mispunctuated run-on sentence.

Executive Producers

Another mispunctuated run-on sentence.

Writing

Unsourced.

Setting

Unsourced.

Themes

Probably beyond obvious. I'd say "unsourced", but my real objection is that if this is all that can be said, there's no use saying anything.

Home media

Run-on sentence.

Success

Hopelessly biased. It says that most reviews were mixed, and then proceeds to list only positive comments.

Awards and nominations

Another WP:NUMERO violation.

Criticism and controversy

No controversy to be found here, but it does seem to have all the negative parts of those mixed reviews. Fold it together with "Success", and call it "Reception".

International broadcast

Kill the flags, per MOS:ICON.

Merchandise

Another massive run-on sentence.

The following sections have been fixed:

International broadcast, the flags have been removed
Original pilot, the section is no longer a run-on sentence

Comment - This article is no where near where it needs to be for a GA. Most of the references are bare links to sites and a good chunk of the prose is completely unsourced. Consider this was a former GA that got demoted, this needs a bit of work to pass.--Gen. Quon (talk) 20:07, 6 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Failing; still unsourced sections after a month. Wizardman _{Operation Big Bear} 12:39, 9 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]