Talk:Board of Ordnance

This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.
It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:

Politics of the United Kingdom

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Politics of the United Kingdom, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Politics of the United Kingdom on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Politics of the United KingdomWikipedia:WikiProject Politics of the United KingdomTemplate:WikiProject Politics of the United KingdomPolitics of the United Kingdom articles

??? This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.

More information:
/
	This article has been automatically rated by a bot or other tool because one or more other projects use this class. Please ensure the assessment is correct before removing the `\|auto=` parameter.

Military history: Maritime / British / European / Early Modern B‑class

This article is within the scope of the Military history WikiProject. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and see a list of open tasks. To use this banner, please see the full instructions.Military historyWikipedia:WikiProject Military historyTemplate:WikiProject Military historymilitary history articles

B

This article has been rated as B-class on the project's quality scale.

This article has been checked against the following criteria for B-class status:
Referencing and citation: criterion met Coverage and accuracy: criterion met Structure: criterion met Grammar and style: criterion met Supporting materials: criterion met

Associated task forces:
/
	Maritime warfare task force
	British military history task force
	European military history task force
	Early Modern warfare task force (c. 1500 – c. 1800)

Stub

I have added stub templates to this article, because there is far too little on the scope of the Board's responsibilities in the 18th century. I have examining the minutes of the Board in Public Record Office for 1750 to 1790, and it is clear to me that there is much more to be said. However, I was looking for evidence on contractors for cannon, shot, and muskets, not at the activities of the board, and am thus not qualified to add more than I have done. Peterkingiron 08:51, 30 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Improvement

I was lured here from Broad arrow and made some improvements but have given up for the moment due to the lack of decent sources and the fact that they clash in terms of dates and crucial info etc. Mhicaoidh (talk) 10:52, 12 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Explosives as Fog Horn

I would like to know more about the role of the Board of Ordnance and the Royal Artillery in the colony of Newfoundland, specifically at Fort Amherst. This fort, and other posts nearby, were established for military defense of the harbor. A gunner with the Royal Artillery was responsible for discharging the foghorn every 30 minutes when Cape Spear was shrouded in fog. (1) Are there records to show what type of cannon or gun was used for the purpose of a foghorn at that time? I have read letters of the lighthouse administration complaining of the positioning of the gun, that the blasts were damaging the windows of the lighthouse, and potentially could damage the lighting apparatus. (2) Are there any records to show what unit/personnel, specifically Joseph Sandiford, was stationed there approx. around 1836-1837? This was prior to early 1838, as there are court records that Sandiford was back in England by 1838, when his boots were stolen from the barracks in Woolwich. Thanks! Klossoke (talk) 12:45, 21 May 2017 (UTC)klossoke[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 4 external links on Board of Ordnance. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 10:14, 22 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]