Talk:Boao Forum for Asia

China Mid‑importance

	China portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject China, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of China related articles on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.ChinaWikipedia:WikiProject ChinaTemplate:WikiProject ChinaChina-related articles
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

Organizations Low‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Organizations, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Organizations on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.OrganizationsWikipedia:WikiProject OrganizationsTemplate:WikiProject Organizationsorganization articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Boao vs. Bo'ao

The official website uses Boao, but Bo'ao is correct. Page move? Anna Frodesiak (talk) 12:03, 28 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

I say why not? Official sources such as UNESCO may call 泰山 "Mount Taishan", but our article titles are of course not always in line with them, particularly in those incorrect cases. GotR ^Talk 23:25, 28 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Fair enough. If it's correct, it's correct. So, I guess that's two "supports" because I'm in favour too.

On the same note, what of this? Google shows the apostrophe half the time. I think with apostrophe is right. Can no apostrophe be right? Anna Frodesiak (talk) 03:23, 29 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

According to pinyin orthography rules, "Ao" starts with 'a', so an apostrophe must precede it. A lot of people don't know this rule, so they assume you need the apostrophe only if confusion might result otherwise (Chang-'an or Chan-gan). The apostrophe in Bo'ao is technically necessary, but wouldn't introduce any ambiguity if omitted. But some sources probably just have a rule against using such apostrophes or carelessly omit it. Shrigley (talk) 03:46, 29 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on Boao Forum for Asia. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 10:03, 22 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]