This article must adhere to the biographies of living persons (BLP) policy, even if it is not a biography, because it contains material about living persons. Contentious material about living persons that is unsourced or poorly sourcedmust be removed immediately from the article and its talk page, especially if potentially libellous. If such material is repeatedly inserted, or if you have other concerns, please report the issue to this noticeboard.If you are a subject of this article, or acting on behalf of one, and you need help, please see this help page.
This article is rated Stub-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Biographybiography articles
This article was provided with references by an Unreferenced articles project volunteer on 2010-01-26. If you edit this page, please build on the good work by citingyour sources.Unreferenced articlesWikipedia:WikiProject Unreferenced articlesTemplate:WikiProject Unreferenced articlesUnreferenced articles articles
Does not "Among numerous publications are substantial entries on ancient music for the latest editions of The New Grove Dictionary of Music and Musicians, Die Musik in Geschichte und Gegenwart, The Oxford Encyclopedia of Ancient Egypt, and Encyclopædia Iranica" constitute an assertion of notability? New Grove is the standard english-language reference work in this area. Frankly I'd be more worried about this being a copy-vio from some website. David Underdown16:48, 11 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- prod. Info in article is sufficient for notability --contribt to major ref works. can't alledge copyvio from a wbsitee till you findthe site.
I was only really concerned because the same user created two similar length articles in a relatively short space of time, and the style of both looked feasible to have come from a "fan" website (for want of a better description), and I was about to go off line so didn't have chance to do much investigation myself at the time. Googling a few bits and pices from each article doesn't seem to bring up anything like a copy-vio so I'll happily withdraw that query. David Underdown10:14, 12 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]
