Talk:Blythe Intaglios

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Indigenous peoples of North America, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Native Americans, Indigenous peoples in Canada, and related indigenous peoples of North America on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Indigenous peoples of North AmericaWikipedia:WikiProject Indigenous peoples of North AmericaTemplate:WikiProject Indigenous peoples of North AmericaIndigenous peoples of North America articles
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.

California

	California portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject California, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of the U.S. state of California on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.CaliforniaWikipedia:WikiProject CaliforniaTemplate:WikiProject CaliforniaCalifornia articles
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.

National Register of Historic Places Mid‑importance

	National Register of Historic Places portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject National Register of Historic Places, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of U.S. historic sites listed on the National Register of Historic Places on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.National Register of Historic PlacesWikipedia:WikiProject National Register of Historic PlacesTemplate:WikiProject National Register of Historic PlacesNational Register of Historic Places articles
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

United States: Arizona Low‑importance

	United States portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject United States, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of topics relating to the United States of America on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the ongoing discussions. Template Usage Articles Requested! Become a Member Project Talk Alerts United StatesWikipedia:WikiProject United StatesTemplate:WikiProject United StatesUnited States articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	Arizona portal This article is supported by WikiProject Arizona (assessed as Low-importance).

Archaeology Low‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Archaeology, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Archaeology on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.ArchaeologyWikipedia:WikiProject ArchaeologyTemplate:WikiProject ArchaeologyArchaeology articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Visual arts: Public art

	Visual arts portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Visual arts, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of visual arts on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Visual artsWikipedia:WikiProject Visual artsTemplate:WikiProject Visual artsvisual arts articles
	This article is supported by the public art task force.

Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment

This article is or was the subject of a Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment. Further details are available on the course page. Student editor(s): Svixmere.

Above undated message substituted from Template:Dashboard.wikiedu.org assignment by PrimeBOT (talk) 16:01, 16 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Age and Origins

There is no evidence to support the dating of the features specifically to 1000 CE or 450 or 10,000 years ago. This is pure speculation, and as such, it should be omitted.

There is no basis for writing that the features were "most likely created by Mohave and Quechan Indians." At least if the geoglyphs date to earlier than the 1830s, a Mohave or Quechan origin is unlikely. The area's inhabitants during the 18th century were the Halchidhoma, who subsequently moved to the middle Gila River. The area's inhabitants in the early 17th century were the Bahacecha, who subsequently disappear from the historical record. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Rhyme4 (talk • contribs) 15:05, 30 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Rhyme4, you deleted a source that dated the glyphs. Why? Although the BLM says they can't be dated[1], Dorn's work on desert varnish "resulted in plausible dates between 1,060 ± 65 and 1,195 ± 65 years B.P. (Dorn et al.1992).[2]. This source cites that date, and says they were made by Yuman-speaking people. Dougweller (talk) 15:53, 30 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for the clarification. The previous version of the article didn't include any citation of the work by Dorn et al. I'll add that to the article. As for the claim that the geoglyphs were made by Yuman-speaking people, that's pure speculation (although it's not implausible). Rhyme4 (talk) 16:30, 30 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

I've used the von Werlhof et al. 1995 citation, since it's more recent and based on radiocarbon dates, rather than Dorn et al., since varnish dating is widely regarded as unreliable. Rhyme4 (talk) 17:07, 30 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for finding that. As for Yuman-speaking, we should simply state that so-and-so suggests that .... Dougweller (talk) 19:19, 30 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Omission, copied from article

An IP unable to edit the talk page on their mobile and stating that in their edit summary wrote "Thisarticle does not discuss the separate but nearby intaglios of Kokopilli and Cicimitl, considered to be part of the Blythe Intaglios". Doug Weller talk 17:18, 6 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on Blythe Intaglios. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 17:43, 4 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Updating Article for School Assignment

Hello, I'm updating the article for a school assignment. Feel free to make any corrections necessary Svixmere (talk) 04:46, 16 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Rediscovery Section images

The two Rediscovery images are captioned 1 Oct 2016 and 2 Oct 2016 respectively. What is the point of this scenario? Are the caption dates incorrect? SquashEngineer (talk) 04:15, 21 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

No, the dates are correct (I took those photos). They just should not have been put in the "Rediscovery" section. (An earlier edit did this in a attempt to 'spread the images around'.) I've moved them now, so that they now appear at the end of the lead section. Ross Finlayson (talk) 19:32, 22 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]