Talk:Bluewater Michigan Chapter NRHS

Michigan Low‑importance

	Michigan portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Michigan, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of the U.S. state of Michigan on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.MichiganWikipedia:WikiProject MichiganTemplate:WikiProject MichiganMichigan articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Trains Low‑importance

Trains Portal

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Trains, an attempt to build a comprehensive and detailed guide to rail transport on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, you can visit the project page, where you can join the project and/or contribute to the discussion. See also: WikiProject Trains to do list and the Trains Portal.TrainsWikipedia:WikiProject TrainsTemplate:WikiProject Trainsrail transport articles

Low

This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Page deletion discussion

I am astonished to hear that pages on Bluewater have been deleted no less than five times, as Bluewater is one of the largest railway preservation entities in Michigan, and is rather unique among railway preservation organs.

I cannot comment as to whether the average NRHS chapter is encyclopedic, however Bluewater is among the largest, and not representative of NRHS chapters in general, as few preserve (let alone operate) equipment.

Ob-CoI-disclosure: I'm in California. I've had nothing to do with Bluewater since the late 1980s, when I was a passive member who got their newsletter, rode a few for-the-public excursions, and visited their facilities once or twice. I still have a few of their newsletters on file and will backfill with details if I can. I'm adding to this Talk because there have been no less than 5 incidents of Bluewater's page being deleted out of hand, perhaps due to the way it was being created. Hopefully this will be more proper. Harpwolf (talk) 03:18, 22 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

You can help preserve the article by citing resources and generally improving the article. Thanks... ttonyb1 (talk) 19:42, 21 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Potentially biased point of view

This page appears to have been written mostly by someone who is either in the company, a former member, or an associate of it. Words like "successful" do not belong on any encyclopedic article due to the fact that "success" is subjective. I have thus flagged this article so it may be improved. User:mheart (User talk: mheart) 11:40, 20 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Done Its gone now. 68.62.51.65 (talk) 22:43, 15 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Done I removed the POV-check template that has been pending since November 2009. That is too long. The article was updated over a year ago and reading it over now, it does not seem to be biased. Jeff Ogden (talk) 03:24, 20 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Bluewater Michigan Chapter NRHS. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20081227211119/http://www.bluewaternrhs.com:80/MemberServices.html to http://www.bluewaternrhs.com/MemberServices.html

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 16:51, 4 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]