Jump to content

Talk:Blues for the Red Sun/GA1

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

GA Review

[edit]

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch

Reviewer: CrowzRSA 02:32, 4 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Review
Done. RG (talk) 06:25, 12 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Done. RG (talk) 06:25, 12 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]
I've expanded the lead slightly. If it requires more expansion feel free to tell me. RG (talk) 06:25, 12 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]
A system used to distribute sound. I've provided a link in the article. RG (talk) 06:25, 12 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]
  • The album was also popular on album-oriented radio and picked up airplay on stations including KNAC, KISW, WYSP, and KIOZ. — This line does not make sense to me, nor does it read well. CrowzRSA 02:32, 4 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]
How's this for better wording: "The album also received airplay on such album-oriented radio stations as KNAC, KISW, WYSP, and KIOZ." RG (talk) 06:25, 12 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]
  • Daniel Bukszpan has wrote that the album has influenced "countless" bands. — Whoever Daniel Bukszpan is, it should be noted after or before his name (ie MTV's Daniel Bukszpan [or] Daniel Bukszpan of MTV) CrowzRSA 02:32, 4 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]
The author of The Encyclopedia of Heavy Metal. RG (talk) 06:25, 12 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]
That's as specific as the source gets. "a record lauded by many as the template for 21st century bands that have followed in the pioneering wake of Kyuss." RG (talk) 06:25, 12 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]
I've made it clear that this was Steve Taylor's opinion. RG (talk) 06:25, 12 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Done. RG (talk) 06:26, 12 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Truth be told, I'm sort of clueless when it comes to uploading images and things like that. I don't know how to get the image to those measurements. Is there anything I can read to help me with this problem? RG (talk) 06:25, 12 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]
I fixed it. CrowzRSA 17:47, 12 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Done. RG (talk) 06:25, 12 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Result
  1. It is reasonably well written.
    a (prose): b (MoS):
  2. It is factually accurate and verifiable.
    a (references): b (citations to reliable sources): c (No OR):
  3. It is broad in its coverage.
    a (major aspects): b (focused):
  4. It follows the neutral point of view policy.
    Fair representation without bias:
  5. It is stable.
    No edit wars, etc.:
  6. It is illustrated by images, where possible and appropriate.
    a (images are tagged and non-free images have fair use rationales): b (appropriate use with suitable captions):
  7. Overall:
    Pass/Fail:
Everything looks good, so I am passing the article. Congrats, CrowzRSA 17
47, 12 August 2010 (UTC)
Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Talk:Blues_for_the_Red_Sun/GA1&oldid=1136299786"