Jump to content

Talk:Blue shift

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
The following discussions are closed. Please do not modify them. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page, Talk:Blueshift. No further edits should be made to these discussions.

[edit]

How come Redshift is an featured article while this one is a stub? Isn't it the same phenomenon only that they are each others opposites? Perhaps a merge? —Preceding unsigned comment added by 81.228.228.224 (talkcontribs)

The Redshift article is extremely well-sourced, and has lots of illustrations and context. A merge would not be a bad idea. --Kuzaar-T-C- 11:41, 16 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]
It is strange anyway. People must prefer red over blue or something :P. Soon2Bregistered 81.228.228.224 17:53, 17 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Perhaps because this article isn't currently very good? ErkDemon 02:20, 3 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I added a little bit about the limit to blue shift, makes the article a little bit better I think. Feel free to elaborate.--MaizeAndBlue86 (talk) 00:28, 23 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

redirect to redshift

[edit]

Why was this redirected to redshift? None of the information here was merged to that article. 70.51.9.237 (talk) 11:35, 9 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

If the information was useful and non-overlapping, perhaps get it from the history and upload it on the redshift? Headbomb {ταλκWP Physics: PotW} 12:12, 9 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

excised by 128.214.166.211

[edit]

11:17, 23 July 2008 128.214.166.211 (2,971 bytes) (removed pseudoscience)

Limit of blue shift

[edit]

According to well accepted quantum theory, the limit of blue-shift is approached when a half-wavelength of light approaches the planck length. This corresponds to a half-wavelength of 1.616x10^-35 meters, and a frequency of 9.276x10^42 Hz (and defines a minimum period of 1.078x10^-43 seconds, which therefore must be the minimum increment of time in the universe).

Blueshift

[edit]

Should this article not be renamed to blueshift? Redshift is one word. —Anonymous DissidentTalk 04:16, 4 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]


Stub

[edit]

this is relatively minor, but shouldn't there be something on the bottom labeling this article as a stub? —Preceding unsigned comment added by GundamMerc (talkcontribs) 02:34, 17 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]


The discussions above are closed. Please do not modify them. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page, Talk:Blueshift. No further edits should be made to these discussions.