Talk:Blue Rose (role-playing game)

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Role-playing games, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of role-playing games on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Role-playing gamesWikipedia:WikiProject Role-playing gamesTemplate:WikiProject Role-playing gamesrole-playing game articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Fair use rationale for Image:Blue rose cover.jpg

Image:Blue rose cover.jpg is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.

Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If there is other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images uploaded after 4 May, 2006, and lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.

BetacommandBot 02:05, 26 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Confusing wording

By fantasy standards Aldis supports a strongly progressive worldview. Feminism, environmentalism and acceptance of homosexual-transgender lifestyles are strongly implied to be objectively correct

"Objectively correct" is something you say about hypotheses--things that you run experiments about. A political ideology can be based on premises that are objectively correct or incorrect, but the ideology itself cannot be. It's not a hypothesis.

I would change the wording myself, but I don't know what the original editor had in mind. LogicalDash (talk) 06:21, 26 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

I think I know what the editor may have been getting at, but agree the wording is troublesome nonetheless. Some games set out a moral framework of what is, in fact, morally correct in a moral realist sense. That said, it's not a terminology that many in gaming or outside of ethical philosophy use, really, and I am not certain if that is what the editor was getting at. - Sangrolu (talk) 20:25, 5 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The wording in this article isn't just confusing, it's atrocious. "Homosexual-transgender lifestyles", are you kidding me? Who wrote this, Conservapedia?174.21.127.10 (talk) 07:18, 14 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on Blue Rose (role-playing game). Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 14:25, 4 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]